Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

105

Think about the timeline;

  1. There were hints here and there of HCQ (anti-parasite) from late summer last year (2020).
  2. Then HCQ (anti-parasite) craze died off. It was completely manufactured and inorganic (the craze about HCQ (anti-parasite)).
  3. Now comes late winter 2020 and the jew-forced, mRNA gene-editing, immune destroying, bio-weapon vaxx is released.
  4. So does the hype for ivermectin (anti-parasite), not HCQ (anti-parasite).
  5. Anyone of any curious nature will ask why. Which is natural.
    • The reason why is twofold;
    • 1st Ivermectin is better at fighting opportunistic parasite 2nd ivermectin has worse side-effects.
    • The former reason is the important one, so ignore the latter, we're past that.

Ivermectin is better at fighting opportunistic parasitic infections. The former reason above is important because as we've all probably become aware over the past many months is the issue of opportunistic infections. What's ignored often is what kind of infections. The most opportunistic infections are parasitic in nature. They aren't cleaned by simple hot water, hand scrubbing and general cleanliness. They take a healthy immune system a healthy environment and a healthy lifestyle to 'avoid'.

So when you hear "Ivermectin cured covid!!!" coming from INDIA of all places. A place where they bathe in feces, eat feces and worship feces... well, think about where the body would get rid of parasites and where parasites would thrive.

Then for the nagging question that was extremely annoying to attempt to answer.

Why are the invading hordes of subhumans given ivermectin and not the vax?

Because they come from regions where NONE of healthy behavior or habits or lifestyles are adhered to. They're filthy animals covered in disease and parasites and in their home land they die constantly from these maladies. In the US and Europe that can't be allowed.

So no. Neither Ivermectin nor HCQ cure covid, cancer, heart disease, blood pressure issues .... ugh what else has been claimed ... they cure parasites, where ivermectin has more severe, though similar; side-effects to HCQ.

If you don't get the jew-vax then why would ivermectin all of the sudden, just randomly in 2021 be this magical cure-all? Why? Ask yourself this. Ask yourself the true intentions behind these assertions.

**Think about the timeline;** 1. There were hints here and there of HCQ (anti-parasite) from late summer last year (2020). 2. Then HCQ (anti-parasite) craze died off. It was completely manufactured and inorganic (the craze about HCQ (anti-parasite)). 3. Now comes late winter 2020 and the jew-forced, mRNA gene-editing, immune destroying, bio-weapon vaxx is released. 4. So does the hype for ivermectin (anti-parasite), not HCQ (anti-parasite). 5. Anyone of any curious nature will ask why. Which is natural. - The reason why is twofold; - 1^st Ivermectin is better at fighting opportunistic parasite 2^nd ivermectin has worse side-effects. - The former reason is the important one, so ignore the latter, we're past that. **Ivermectin is better at fighting opportunistic parasitic infections.** The former reason above is important because as we've all probably become aware over the past many months is the issue of opportunistic infections. What's ignored often is what kind of infections. The most opportunistic infections are parasitic in nature. They aren't cleaned by simple hot water, hand scrubbing and general cleanliness. They take a healthy immune system a healthy environment and a healthy lifestyle to 'avoid'. So when you hear "Ivermectin cured covid!!!" coming from INDIA of all places. A place where they bathe in feces, eat feces and worship feces... well, think about where the body would get rid of parasites and where parasites would thrive. Then for the nagging question that was extremely annoying to attempt to answer. >Why are the invading hordes of subhumans given ivermectin and not the vax? Because they come from regions where NONE of healthy behavior or habits or lifestyles are adhered to. They're filthy animals covered in disease and parasites and in their home land they die constantly from these maladies. In the US and Europe that can't be allowed. So no. Neither Ivermectin nor HCQ cure covid, cancer, heart disease, blood pressure issues .... ugh what else has been claimed ... they cure parasites, where ivermectin has more severe, though similar; side-effects to HCQ. If you don't get the jew-vax then why would ivermectin all of the sudden, just randomly in 2021 be this magical cure-all? Why? Ask yourself this. Ask yourself the true intentions behind these assertions.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (18).
[–] • 0 pt

I don't have a problem with the mrna being different, the technology looks reasonable and science moves on. We can't keep scraping the pus out of cow boils. Something being new isn't automatically a bad thing, it's just that the risk in unquantifiable at the moent.

Reporting on this is complicated because it's not always clear on why someone dies, was it that plane crash or was it covid... it's also muddled that politicians have a financial interest in people just getting back to work, so if their plan is to use a vaccine as per usual then they would probably skew everything to make that look like the best option, and hope it works. Doing nothing doesn't work and herd immunity didn't work in Sweden. Long term it looks like we will just get it, and die or not die, vaccines seem to just make it less fatal. Stats seem to back this up. Stats is actually the other problem, you can misrepresent them and you can have sloppy collation, and this is abused by both sides and jew media only reports on one angle

The idea that lots of people are dying I'm just going to think is an attempt to push doing nothing. There's not much evidence of that imo

What is infuriating from my pro position is the jew media is constantly lying over everything, biden cult proselytising is as bad as trump cult proselytising, but the other side doesn't have to be wrong just because of ideology.
The fact that they are so transparently lying is a really good reason for you to dismiss everything they say, except I do think the vaccine approach is reasonable regardless.

The second complication is that as a scientist, not following the party line on it's effectiveness gets you cancelled, so another really good reason to dismiss everything they say. But that doesn't necessarily mean it's wrong, it's just that they are desperate to get the most people jabbed and back to work, before they get too nervous about what the cat ladies on facebook are blaming it on this week.

There are two halves to the opposition, the trump cult who bought into his egotistical mask hesitancy and his clownish talking up of random shit like bleach and ivermectin, because not doing what boffins tell you is the default response for some Americans. And the people who watch osteopaths on bitchute and make a whole string of assumptions that they possibly don't understand. Neither are that compelling to me.

If you ignore the jew media screwing up the issue by lying, you are left with scientists who are mostly pro, and a few possibly equally qualified naysayers. On balance I'm going with that scientists normally have an interest in doing the right thing, and it's not like we just have a single approach, there is a selection of vaccines. If some kill you then statistically that's just part of the risk, people die in their bed every day but we don't blame the pillows.

Autism, lots of research says its nothing, if one report out of twenty says its connected then we are still looking at it being nothing

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

If you were to spend some time with me, I could dismantle this for you like an engineer dismantles a machine.

Not that I want to spend any time with you, I just want to make the point that to dismantle your cognitive structure about what is real and what isn't real is trivial BUT takes time because of how human brains absorb information.

I am would like to only leave you with a hint: your entire mental model of the world is based on the following presupposition ... " scientists are basically good people trying to help the world and directionally their works (because it is the scientific method afterall) produces useful and REPRODUCIBLE knowledge.

This is false and I can demonstrate it, but not in one or two arguments. I would have to show you over a significant enough period of time so that the part of your brain sitting behind your pre-frontal cortex has time to absorb the information for you.

However, I admit the last two statements can only be read from your perspective as a kind of lunatic writing the suggestion that his conspiracy theories have merit.

What I do appreciate is that it sounds like you have a background in practical scientific research and if that is the case, even if I think they are wrong, your strong counter arguments are a useful conversational test of merit of a statement.

In other words, I appreciate what you wrote and that you believe it and if you do actually have a background in practical science, keep on posting. It's good practice for all of us. I just wanted to share a perspective and put my finger on other side of the scale that you sit on.

// EDIT: Agreed fully on your jew commentary, that is spot on.