Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

1.4K

Today I saw this post from @QueensNYGuy. The gist of the video is that military service members have to get the vaccine by Friday, or they’re kicked out, losing all earned benefits. Effective Friday, the military will no longer contain any individuals who are willing to disobey an order and lose everything they’ve worked for in order to defend themselves.

Then I was reminded of this post from the other day from @LakotaPride. The gist of this article is that the house just passed HR4350, a red-flag gun law aimed at military service members, wherein a military court can deem any member, active or past, unfit to own or possess a firearm. It also includes this text:

Additionally, military court protective orders issued on an emergency basis are exempted from providing the recipient with the standard “right to due process.” Instead, “notice and opportunity to be heard” must only be provided after an order was already issued.

So within a span of less then two weeks, they will have removed every soldier who would have been likely to defend liberty AND have the ability to strip their personal gun rights away at any moment due to an “emergency.”

I hope you all are stocked on ammo.

Today I saw [this post](https://poal.co/s/CoronaVirus/443226) from @QueensNYGuy. The gist of the video is that military service members have to get the vaccine by Friday, or they’re kicked out, losing all earned benefits. Effective Friday, the military will no longer contain any individuals who are willing to disobey an order and lose everything they’ve worked for in order to defend themselves. Then I was reminded of [this post](https://poal.co/s/QStorm/441685) from the other day from @LakotaPride. The gist of this article is that the house just passed HR4350, a red-flag gun law aimed at military service members, wherein a military court can deem any member, active or past, unfit to own or possess a firearm. It also includes this text: > Additionally, military court protective orders issued on an emergency basis are exempted from providing the recipient with the standard “right to due process.” Instead, “notice and opportunity to be heard” must only be provided after an order was already issued. So within a span of less then two weeks, they will have removed every soldier who would have been likely to defend liberty AND have the ability to strip their personal gun rights away at any moment due to an “emergency.” I hope you all are stocked on ammo.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (313).
[–] • 2 pts

That’s retarded. Even soldiers, in general, don’t “want to” go out and fight wars. They do it when it’s necessary.

And communities can be small, I’m not talking about rebuilding a new nation. There are absolutely communes that exist right now that you, the government, and the military have no idea exist. That doesn’t get harder to do just because the occupation changes.

A guy like me can go either way, I love hurting people and cute cuddly animals

Cool, go and build your army of psychopaths and see how long you all last with each other

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

It IS necessary and it is fun. Your generation is a bunch of worthless cunts, you're a bunch of failures.

The chinks aren't going to let you do anything, bud. They're going to take all the females and fuck 'em good. Maybe they'll let you watch before they line you up and blow your heads off.

[–] • 0 pt

Thank god you and your militia of serial killers will save us all then

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

No, there is no militia of serial killers, that's the problem.

Because that's what it would take.

Your sorry wimp asses better hope and pray that Q is real.

[–] • 0 pt

That’s retarded. Even soldiers, in general, don’t “want to” go out and fight wars.

Jihadis do. Their cloth-wrapped muzzwub heads are filled with visions of plunder, rape, and high status among the other wubs, and that holds whether they live or die.

[–] • 1 pt

Yes, that’s what “in general” means. That the statement doesn’t apply to every single case