Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

358

Today I saw this post from @QueensNYGuy. The gist of the video is that military service members have to get the vaccine by Friday, or they’re kicked out, losing all earned benefits. Effective Friday, the military will no longer contain any individuals who are willing to disobey an order and lose everything they’ve worked for in order to defend themselves.

Then I was reminded of this post from the other day from @LakotaPride. The gist of this article is that the house just passed HR4350, a red-flag gun law aimed at military service members, wherein a military court can deem any member, active or past, unfit to own or possess a firearm. It also includes this text:

Additionally, military court protective orders issued on an emergency basis are exempted from providing the recipient with the standard “right to due process.” Instead, “notice and opportunity to be heard” must only be provided after an order was already issued.

So within a span of less then two weeks, they will have removed every soldier who would have been likely to defend liberty AND have the ability to strip their personal gun rights away at any moment due to an “emergency.”

I hope you all are stocked on ammo.

Today I saw [this post](https://poal.co/s/CoronaVirus/443226) from @QueensNYGuy. The gist of the video is that military service members have to get the vaccine by Friday, or they’re kicked out, losing all earned benefits. Effective Friday, the military will no longer contain any individuals who are willing to disobey an order and lose everything they’ve worked for in order to defend themselves. Then I was reminded of [this post](https://poal.co/s/QStorm/441685) from the other day from @LakotaPride. The gist of this article is that the house just passed HR4350, a red-flag gun law aimed at military service members, wherein a military court can deem any member, active or past, unfit to own or possess a firearm. It also includes this text: > Additionally, military court protective orders issued on an emergency basis are exempted from providing the recipient with the standard “right to due process.” Instead, “notice and opportunity to be heard” must only be provided after an order was already issued. So within a span of less then two weeks, they will have removed every soldier who would have been likely to defend liberty AND have the ability to strip their personal gun rights away at any moment due to an “emergency.” I hope you all are stocked on ammo.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (313).
[–] • 0 pt (edited )

I'm doing a lot more to help than you could ever manage. The best you have is, "let's kill people!"

So first of all you’ve completely misrepresented me from the start. I encouraged people to prepare to defend themselves. You’re the one who came in with the civil war and violence talk.

You think someone is coming to kill you but they won't

Also never said or implied this. I said that they are intending to remove our freedoms. You have a really bad habit of taking what you want me to be saying and then acting like I’m saying that. Are YOU a fed?

You think I'm just sitting on the sideline because I'm not helping you clamor for violence

I think you’re sitting on the sideline because you literally started this conversation by encouraging everyone to sit on the sideline. “Be patient” while other people fix it for us.

Are you immune against organizing or calling for organizing violent events?

Never said, did, or even implied I was going to do either of these things

[–] • 0 pt

So what is it you're accusing me of not doing, officer? Are you accusing me of not being violent or not? That's exactly what it sounds like to me.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

I’m accusing you of encouraging people to be complacent and willfully ignorant of the reality around them rather than to prepare to stand up and defend their liberty as necessary

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Where did I say don't defend themselves? I think, in fact, I did exactly that. Why else would I suggest moving to somewhere else? Safety or stability is one of the biggest reasons people move. Regardless, I'm trying to get no one to be complacent and I'm certainly not encouraging anyone to be ignorant. I think all you have are bad faith arguments and are shrinking back on your retarded diatribe because you realized I was right and that you can get in trouble for calling for mass violence on the internet. I'm unsure what made you not realize that's what feds are doing...

I don't think there's anything wrong with violence. I think pointing it at the wrong people is the problem. People trying to physically harm you or your family or damage your property should be perfectly, fully legally defended (*against). I have no issue stating that and I would be suspicious of anyone that would have an issue with it. But you will not be permitted to go on some hanging spree and I'm not sure how you seem to think there's room for negotiation.