You're simply wrong. Read the first post; it is not a neutral pathological assessment—it is a warning against being convinced to abdicate the "democratic process". Being realistic about what the establishment has already achieved does not equate to "disinformation", quite the opposite.
No, you are wrong.
You are assuming that because he stated “only once elections are abandoned” that he is warning against abandoning elections. The reality is that he is simply describing a process. I don’t know how this can be difficult for anyone to understand at this point.
I do understand. He is saying that this is part of "the plan" to undermine faith in elections, and then they can delcare the NWO. I'm saying that the establishment already has things so well in hand that they don't need to rush to dispense with the democratic facade, as it simply isn't important anymore as a path of resistance (and hasn't been for some time). Again, if it's a color revolution it has already been achieved and we're just being distracted by political theatre. Is this computing yet?
I’m honestly just tired of responding to your gibberish that explains nothing other than how little you understand about this conversation.
Have a great day.
(post is archived)