Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

871

Az audit: The strategy is clear. The left will simply claim the audit confirms a Biden win. It does not matter what the audit actually says.

I have seen half a dozen articles and shill posts this morning all saying "SEE!!! We told you!!! the audit confirms Biden won AZ!" but the audit has not even been release yet. One of these articles says they had seen three different leaked versions of the audit but totally ignores the fact that this means that at least two of them were forgeries. The media knows very few people will actually read it so they can claim it says anything they want.

The right will do the same. facts and data points will be cherry picked to show massive voter fraud. Both sides will escalate their rhetoric.

People STILL do not understand the color revolution playbook. A 'stolen election' is critical to the plan. A majority of the citizens need to be convinced that "We cannot fix this by voting." Only then can a majority of the people be convinced that democratic processes need to be suspended.

Az audit: The strategy is clear. The left will simply claim the audit confirms a Biden win. It does not matter what the audit actually says. I have seen half a dozen articles and shill posts this morning all saying "SEE!!! We told you!!! the audit confirms Biden won AZ!" but the audit has not even been release yet. One of these articles says they had seen three different leaked versions of the audit but totally ignores the fact that this means that at least two of them were forgeries. The media knows very few people will actually read it so they can claim it says anything they want. The right will do the same. facts and data points will be cherry picked to show massive voter fraud. Both sides will escalate their rhetoric. People STILL do not understand the color revolution playbook. A 'stolen election' is critical to the plan. A majority of the citizens need to be convinced that "We cannot fix this by voting." Only then can a majority of the people be convinced that democratic processes need to be suspended.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (27).
[–] • 5 pts

there is no longer a representative government of the people, there are no longer constitutional rights, and civil war is coming.

You REALLY need to read up on Color Revolutions. Color Revolutions are THE process by which the CIA has been toppling governments and installing puppet governments all over the world since the '70s. It is a specific playbook for taking over a country.

The Color Revolution Playbook

  1. Drive social unrest via wedge issues in the populace. Astro-turf radical voices on both sides of every issue. Organize protests and the counter protests. Start riots. Recruit useful idiots.

  2. Destroy confidence in election integrity by obviously tampering with elections. Make it easy to see. Get people to think voting is not an option. >>> YOU ARE HERE

  3. Useful Idiots that have been radicalized put down their ballots and pick up their weapons. Does not want to be big scale, just public. Anything like small scale attacks, something blows up, etc.

  4. funnel military aid and leadership to whatever fringe group you have best puppet control over

  5. Murder everyone who is not your puppet

  6. Declare new government

[–] • 0 pt

Not sure what your message is really... There are already enough non-whites + globohomo indoctrinated Whites in most White countries that voting isn't going to achieve anything meaningful in any event. As for radicalization, the media and establishment can define 'radical' as whatever they want; on the other hand, it's clear that we need to start thinking and behaving in a radically different fashion if we're to survive the anti-white + globhomo war. Your comments seem to imply that democracy is inherently favourable, but: a) I think we're already at a stage of corruption and decline where it doesn't matter that much. b) Should some White nations survive or new ones emerge, there would be good reasons for them to be skeptical of the narrative of democratic superiority.

[–] • 1 pt

My message... Color Revolutions are used because they work really well and are very hard to counter. The only counter to a color revolution is to unite the people because the playbook depends on a divided people. If you allow yourself to fall for the false division you have already lost. see what I said here: https://poal.co/s/TellPoal/441028/7714b788-c3b6-41c3-8b35-e2f678e5d967#cmnts

[–] • 1 pt

Ok, but unite how? Politically? Are we supposed to unite into juggernaut voting block? You're being kind of vague, and if you really think we can unite then I submit that you don't appreciate the vested interests of some sub-groups (i.e. most non-whites have no incentive to unite with Whites when they stand to inherit the West) or how far along the brainwashing is. There is no monolothic "people" in the West, and the most significant divisions are not false at all.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Did… did you even read the comment that you responded to?

no, you’re not crazy

[–] • 0 pt

Yes, I did. Also, I didn't imply that he's "crazy", only that he's perhaps holding on to some misguided optimism about working within current systems (and the long-term viability of those systems in the first place). Don't be a drama queen.

If this is a color revolution, it's already been won. The entire establishment and most of our people are against us; adjust your outlook and strategies accordingly.

[–] • 0 pt

I guess I do have some reading to do. It’s not something I’ve ever had to learn about. Iworry though that this instance is larger and different, the stakes are higher, the players are United against the peoples. I wouldn’t use history as a guide here.