Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

254

Az audit: The strategy is clear. The left will simply claim the audit confirms a Biden win. It does not matter what the audit actually says.

I have seen half a dozen articles and shill posts this morning all saying "SEE!!! We told you!!! the audit confirms Biden won AZ!" but the audit has not even been release yet. One of these articles says they had seen three different leaked versions of the audit but totally ignores the fact that this means that at least two of them were forgeries. The media knows very few people will actually read it so they can claim it says anything they want.

The right will do the same. facts and data points will be cherry picked to show massive voter fraud. Both sides will escalate their rhetoric.

People STILL do not understand the color revolution playbook. A 'stolen election' is critical to the plan. A majority of the citizens need to be convinced that "We cannot fix this by voting." Only then can a majority of the people be convinced that democratic processes need to be suspended.

Az audit: The strategy is clear. The left will simply claim the audit confirms a Biden win. It does not matter what the audit actually says. I have seen half a dozen articles and shill posts this morning all saying "SEE!!! We told you!!! the audit confirms Biden won AZ!" but the audit has not even been release yet. One of these articles says they had seen three different leaked versions of the audit but totally ignores the fact that this means that at least two of them were forgeries. The media knows very few people will actually read it so they can claim it says anything they want. The right will do the same. facts and data points will be cherry picked to show massive voter fraud. Both sides will escalate their rhetoric. People STILL do not understand the color revolution playbook. A 'stolen election' is critical to the plan. A majority of the citizens need to be convinced that "We cannot fix this by voting." Only then can a majority of the people be convinced that democratic processes need to be suspended.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (27).
[–] • 0 pt

Not sure what your message is really... There are already enough non-whites + globohomo indoctrinated Whites in most White countries that voting isn't going to achieve anything meaningful in any event. As for radicalization, the media and establishment can define 'radical' as whatever they want; on the other hand, it's clear that we need to start thinking and behaving in a radically different fashion if we're to survive the anti-white + globhomo war. Your comments seem to imply that democracy is inherently favourable, but: a) I think we're already at a stage of corruption and decline where it doesn't matter that much. b) Should some White nations survive or new ones emerge, there would be good reasons for them to be skeptical of the narrative of democratic superiority.

[–] • 1 pt

My message... Color Revolutions are used because they work really well and are very hard to counter. The only counter to a color revolution is to unite the people because the playbook depends on a divided people. If you allow yourself to fall for the false division you have already lost. see what I said here: https://poal.co/s/TellPoal/441028/7714b788-c3b6-41c3-8b35-e2f678e5d967#cmnts

[–] • 1 pt

Ok, but unite how? Politically? Are we supposed to unite into juggernaut voting block? You're being kind of vague, and if you really think we can unite then I submit that you don't appreciate the vested interests of some sub-groups (i.e. most non-whites have no incentive to unite with Whites when they stand to inherit the West) or how far along the brainwashing is. There is no monolothic "people" in the West, and the most significant divisions are not false at all.

[–] • 1 pt

You may be right... but then we have already lost and I am not the quiting type.

Our message should be simple. It is not about left vs right. It is about rich vs poor. That strikes close enough to the truth and it is a banner you can actually rally people to.

If we try to separate, divide, and segregate we will be defeated.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Did… did you even read the comment that you responded to?

no, you’re not crazy

[–] • 0 pt

Yes, I did. Also, I didn't imply that he's "crazy", only that he's perhaps holding on to some misguided optimism about working within current systems (and the long-term viability of those systems in the first place). Don't be a drama queen.

If this is a color revolution, it's already been won. The entire establishment and most of our people are against us; adjust your outlook and strategies accordingly.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

I didn’t say you called him crazy, I only implied that he might think he was crazy when he saw how nonsensical your response was. Nowhere did he say anything about democracy being the most viable option. All he did was list out the steps of a color revolution and point out the similarities to what’s happening now. Your response flat out ignored actual things that he said and even fed into what the mainstream narrative would be during a color revolution.

So I’m not sure that you actually did read it