Really is no choice. The employer has every right to require something like that as a condition of employment. I know Kristi Noem got a ton of flack for her stance on this a while back, but she is correct. Companies are free to require that or not.
If your friend wants to commit fraud, he can get one test, then just change the date on the doc and print it out every week. I do believe they sell tests that use saliva (?), then all he needs to do is spit and not actually touch anything. Not sure if Mack would accept that test or not.
One other thing is, what is done with the results? Does the lab report to the gubmint? If in the future, someone tests positive and it is reported to the gubmint, will they come to that person's door and forcibly quarantine them in their home or an isolated camp?
scary times we live in!
Hey, surrender fag: no employer has the right to mandate an experimental injection as a condition of employment. Nor do they have any authority to force test for something that has yet to be proven to exist. It is spineless pussies like you that have turned this country upside down. Nice work.
it's not about surrendering, so put your dick back in your pants. I believe a baker should have the right to refuse service to a tranny, and any business should have the right to hire only who they want to hire. If I have a Christian business, then it should be my right to only hire Christians. Shouldn't I be able to own a business and choose not to hire fags/trannys/sjws/whatever? Same goes for any business. If the owner decides jab/testing or no job, then they should have that right, but I believe other businesses should also have the right to say only no-vax employees.
Employers should never have the right to stick anything into your body. Period.
(post is archived)