Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.1K

Newton’s 3rd Law states that object B exerts an equal and opposite force on object A when A exerts a force on B.

So it doesn’t matter how fast a “plane” is going when it hits a skyscraper. The result is still a completely obliterated plane outside the building. It is literally the same effect as if you put a Boeing 767 on a giant golf tee and smacked it with a steel and concrete skyscraper going hundreds of mph.

Planes crumple and become disfigured even when in flight.

Skyscrapers like the twin towers, on the other hand, are specifically designed to withstand such trauma. Look at construction pictures and see the concrete-filled trusses and steel columns involved in their construction.

This would be akin to saying that a beer can will go into a tree trunk if you shoot the can fast enough.

I agree that the “how” of 9/11 isn’t nearly as important as the “who” and “why.” But it also gets tiresome seeing assertions that “no planes” is some sort of psy-op when it’s clearly the best explanation for the video we were shown.

I could make the entire case here, or at least show a lot more evidence, but let’s just see what weak-ass opposition arises first.

Newton’s 3rd Law states that object B exerts an equal and opposite force on object A when A exerts a force on B. So it doesn’t matter how fast a “plane” is going when it hits a skyscraper. The result is still a completely obliterated plane outside the building. It is literally the same effect as if you put a Boeing 767 on a giant golf tee and smacked it with a steel and concrete skyscraper going hundreds of mph. Planes crumple and become disfigured even when [hitting birds](https://resources.stuff.co.nz/content/dam/images/1/l/w/5/r/n/image.related.StuffLandscapeSixteenByNine.1420x800.1lw61o.png/1506368053584.jpg) in flight. Skyscrapers like the twin towers, on the other hand, are specifically designed to withstand such trauma. Look at construction pictures and see the concrete-filled trusses and steel columns involved in their construction. This would be akin to saying that a beer can will go into a tree trunk if you shoot the can fast enough. I agree that the “how” of 9/11 isn’t nearly as important as the “who” and “why.” But it also gets tiresome seeing assertions that “no planes” is some sort of psy-op when it’s clearly the best explanation for the video we were shown. I could make the entire case here, or at least show a lot more evidence, but let’s just see what weak-ass opposition arises first.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (55).
[–] • 1 pt

the engines, probably, the rest just crumbles

WCT-7 is the real question, solve that one and you also have the rest

[–] • 0 pt

its not a matter of components its a matter of weight and mass. why do you think a bullet is powerfull? cuz it shoots super hard? i mean cummon. when you have a plane doing +300km/hr every aspect of it becomes a bullet. who cares what the bullet is made of the mass and hardness is still there

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

No, it’s essentially a hollow aluminum object. Not like a bullet at all, which is solid and lead.

[–] • 0 pt

You are comparing a solid lead slug with a thin aluminum tube, lol

[–] • 0 pt

what is the function of sharpness? mass velocity and side profile

[–] • 0 pt

The basic idea is true, but, you assessment lacks of reality in numbers

Meaning: You do not get the expected effect from that substance (alluminum structure) + that speed (it is NOT, at all, anywhere near a bullet)

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Ultimatly Who cares about planes or not planes.

All other evidence points to mossad and nothing is being done about it. We should focus on the implicating evidence fingering mossad.

What I'm getting at is... read all these comments. They aren't talking about mossad role. It's all banter about details that wont lead to finger who did it.

We know WHAT happened We dont know exactly HOW it happened. we know WHERE it happened We know WHEN it happened We know WHO did it, but we dont talk about that enough. There is a lot of evidence to talk about, that implicates mossad.

Dominic suter, urban moving systems The isralie art students Silverstein What about all the wallstreet trading?