It's been obvious for a while now. The experimental vaccines not only have horrific side effects that hit people very quickly, or within a few weeks; they also give no benefit of any kind. The CDC and other organs of fascism will tell you that they reduce the severity of cases. How do we know this? Why should we believe it, when everything that comes out of their mouths is a lie? I personally don't believe it. What I do believe is that the vax weakens your immune system and makes it more likely that you will catch Covid, and more likely that the Covid you catch will be serious or fatal.
Also, bonus gift from the vax, it makes people who take it into super spreaders, who carry five times the virus loads as the unvaccinated up their snouts. The good news, if you've had Covid and got over it on your own, without the vax, you are virtually immune from getting it again in the near term. So we who have had the disease but not the vax can associate with these brainless vaxed super-spreaders without catching the disease, or transmitting it to others.
I had family stay with me for a while. Besides the mess they left behind I also had a headache for half a day and it wasn't from talking to them. Pretty sure that vaccine they took gave me something, but my immune system slapped the shit out of it in short order.
I’m not contradicting you, I’m not pro-vaccine, in fact I apparently differ in thinking that the “virus” was just a construct all along, but I do know a lot of people who have got the shot and none have had “horrific side effects.”
It can take up to 3 years, to kill you. For real. What some mRNA vaccine do is crazyshit, it literally triggers a genetic mutation in your body, which in turn creates micro blood clots all over the place, which in turn can lead to pulmonary artery hypertension https://poal.co/s/Vax/424467/b11def66-2072-4d58-beb3-e3d7daf377a2 and "people with Pulmonary Artery Hypertension usually die of right sided heart failure within three years"
You also have a vaccine induced aids showing up that’s not being discussed. YouTube pulled the full video, someone saved the important two minute clip and uploaded it to rumble, the full 30 minute interview was good though, he discussed how other doctors and nurses were worried and didn’t want the vax and knew what was going on with the vaxxed but they’re not allowed to talk about it publicly.
He’s a practicing pathologist and epidemiologist at the mayo clinic I believe.
In aids it’s your “T cells/cd4” that are affected which are helper cells for the immune system, that’s why aids patients can live longer, it doesn’t attack their main immune system, so it takes longer for the disease to advance or to show symptoms.
With the vaccine it’s your “killer T cells/cd8” which are the “marines” of your immune system and they’re significantly lower in the vaxxed even 8 months later. According to him it’s unknown if they’ll raise back to normal levels but they may. With booster shots I’d doubt it and it would probably lower them even further.
They detect cancer cells and viruses/bacteria and destroy them before it grows or become infectious. What’s he’s saying is just the short term complications(8 months) give it a few years and you’re going to see an explosion of cancers, autoimmune diseases and viral and bacterial infections.
I think some studies have shown infections with previous coronaviruses provide immunity also through the innate immune system.
All the “scientists” and politicians talk about are antibodies, never the innate immune system.
"innate immune system" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Innate_immune_system
The innate immune system is one of the two main immunity strategies found in vertebrates (the other being the adaptive immune system). The innate immune system is an older evolutionary defense strategy, relatively speaking, and is the dominant immune system response found in plants, fungi, insects, and primitive multicellular organisms.[1]
The major functions of the vertebrate innate immune system include:
Recruiting immune cells to sites of infection through the production of chemical factors, including specialized chemical mediators called cytokines Activation of the complement cascade to identify bacteria, activate cells, and promote clearance of antibody complexes or dead cells Identification and removal of foreign substances present in organs, tissues, blood and lymph, by specialized white blood cells Activation of the adaptive immune system through a process known as antigen presentation Acting as a physical and chemical barrier to infectious agents; via physical measures like skin or tree bark and chemical measures like clotting factors in blood or sap from a tree, which are released following a contusion or other injury that breaks through the first-line physical barrier (not to be confused with a second-line physical or chemical barrier, such as the blood-brain barrier, which protects the extremely vital and highly sensitive nervous system from pathogens that have already gained access to the host's body).
I think some studies
Why would we give a shit what the priests of scientism have to say on this matter?
And why would you promote them as any sort of authority at all?
Are you some kind of homo or socialist?
But seriously, if tomorrow they stopped saying "four legs good, two legs bad!" long enough to spout off with a deluge of studies, talking about how "ivermectin, vitamin d, exercise, sunshine, guns and american traditionalism vigorously protect the natural immune system!"
..I wouldn't give a shit.
If a blatant psychopathic liar occasionally agrees with you, are you suddenly going to start believing them?
No. You find the truth for yourself, and you don't promote those known to lie.
Don't forgive them.
Shun them.
Every law we follow or don't follow. Every policy we resist or endorse. Every action. Every person we association with. Every belief we encourage or discourage. All of it is either eugenic or dysgenic. It leads to either a healthy society, or a dysfunctional society.
In my opinion the promotion of "expertism" is horribly dysgenic because it wrongly delegates the much more efficient distributed and meritocratic process of private opinion formation to public figure heads that are easily duped, swayed, or influenced by outside political concern. In that regard the worship or even mention of experts is a sleight of hand, and a dishonest, albeit, often unconscious, virtue signal, and attempt to shirk the hard duty of every citizen to find the truth for themselves.
In light of that, there can obviously be no substitute to the forethought of private fact finding among sincere citizens.
Anything else is dereliction of moral duty to the truth and upholding the traditions of the west, which established and maintained us for so long, without which we would have never succeeded as a nation in particular, at all.
We would not have forefathers without forethought.
That is what makes us westerners. That is what makes us American.
Are you retarded or something. Actually studies before covid showed innate immunity to previous coronaviruses. 50% of the population was immune to “covid 19” the day it supposedly hit but those in power wouldn’t admit to it.
Now the approved “scientists” only talk about antibodies instead of the innate immune system. Real scientists who’ve been silenced have been discussing it since the beginning.
Take your meds. There’s such a thing as innate immunity.
We all need some corona titty milk.
Have you ever tasted a woman’s milk? I mean other than your mothers
Yeah, it's alright TBH.
(post is archived)