I'm not referring to today, just in general.
So you're basically saying that mers, sars-cov, 229E, NL63, OC43, and HKU1 just don't exist, since sars-cov-2 is yet another member of the coronavirus family, causing the disease known as covid-19. You're basically claiming that the genome sequencing of those known viruses is just a scientific fraud essentially.
And of course you can demonstrate just that, because you're anything but yet another random user with an opinion, calling everybody else a "retard" for not accepting your opinion backed by zero evidence whatsoever as true
and what tests are they giving all these people that is showing this sequence!?? pcr?? zzzzzz....... and all the millions of md's and phd's censored off of social media who say viral theory is a lie?? zzzzzzzz.......
gfys
Please don't talk as if you knew anything about what you are talking, you've seen headlines here and there and never bothered to do the digging yourself, let alone digging any further, obvious
You can't even explain why PCR tests returned false positives in the US, to begin with, let alone how a PCR test works, and what type of PCR tests, plural, are actually required to identify sars-cov-2/n-cov without returning false positives
And btw PCR tests are used to identify pathogens since decades, that's standard procedure
gfys
"lol"
Word. the coronavirus is a real virus family and until this shit was unleashed generally caused manageable human "colds". OTOH, animal coronaviruses can be deadly and kill slots of animals.
It's the whole idea of biowarfare and big pharma et al benefits from it. It's like saying herpes viruses don't exist or influenza doesn't exist.
the theory is there are pieces of bat, pangolin, human coronavirus, hiv, ebola and some other viral genome segments that make up the cov2 virion; humans have trouble with the animal virus portion and whatever else is packed in there...
Mers wasn't exactly what I would call a manageable cold
Polar bears and sun bears are bears, doesn't mean it's even roughly the exact same specie
I have a better question for you, shill.
If a virus has never been actually isolated, then what are they claiming to be working with or even identify?
Germ theory, just like any other theoretical endeavor, can and will produce skewed and unreliable data, the same data you are professing to be true.
I don't know all the answers, but I know we're being lied to.
>If a virus has never been actually isolated
It has been isolated, the genome sequenced, end of stupid debate, you're still running on an outdated set of facts, you're not serious Now I get that you need to keep repeating it's all fake because that's just the usual convenient way for the lazy to "solve the problem", hence why you didn't bother to update yourself on the matter, because you're lazy https://www.pasteur.fr/en/press-area/press-documents/institut-pasteur-sequences-whole-genome-coronavirus-2019-ncov
Meanwhile, this, is probably what they actually are doing
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marek's_disease#Prevention
>Because vaccination does not prevent infection with the virus, Marek's is still transmissible from vaccinated flocks to other birds, including the wild bird population. The first Marek's disease vaccine was introduced in 1970. The disease would cause mild paralysis, with the only identifiable lesions being in neural tissue.Mortality of chickens infected with Marek's disease was quite low. Current strains of Marek virus, decades after the first vaccine was introduced, cause lymphoma formation throughout the chicken's body and mortality rates have reached 100% in unvaccinated chickens. The Marek's disease vaccine is a "leaky vaccine", which means that only the symptoms of the disease are prevented.[12] Infection of the host and the transmission of the virus are not inhibited by the vaccine. This contrasts with most other vaccines, where infection of the host is prevented. Under normal conditions, highly virulent strains of the virus are not selected. A highly virulent strain would kill the host before the virus would have an opportunity to transmit to other potential hosts and replicate. Thus, less virulent strains are selected. These strains are virulent enough to induce symptoms but not enough to kill the host, allowing further transmission. However, the leaky vaccine changes this evolutionary pressure and permits the evolution of highly virulent strains.[13] The vaccine's inability to prevent infection and transmission allows the spread of highly virulent strains among vaccinated chickens. The fitness of the more virulent strains is increased by the vaccine. The evolution of Marek's disease due to vaccination has had a profound effect on the poultry industry. All chickens across the globe are now vaccinated against Marek's disease (birds hatched in private flocks for laying or exhibition are rarely vaccinated). Highly virulent strains have been selected to the point that any chicken that is unvaccinated will die if infected.[14] Other leaky vaccines are commonly used in agriculture. One vaccine in particular is the vaccine for avian influenza. Leaky vaccine use for avian influenza can select for virulent strains.[15]
(post is archived)