Nah. The entire argument is based on the test is being used wrong. You seriously think everyone believes the test itself is horseshit and you just happen to have it figured out? Lmao.
You're just saying obvious shit and acting like you're above everyone else when you're actually just talking about a subject that nobody else is arguing.
Alright, you want to disrespect me, you can't provide any source for any of your claims and you ask me to school you on top of that
Enough with the kid gloves, you asked for it
“PCR is intended to identify substances qualitatively, but by its very nature is unsuited for estimating numbers. Although there is a common misimpression that the viral load tests actually count the number of viruses in the blood, these tests cannot detect free, infectious viruses at all; they can only detect proteins that are believed, in some cases wrongly, to be unique to HIV. The tests can detect genetic sequences of viruses, but not viruses themselves.”
This is Mullis saying this
What he is saying, is that a PCR tests can't tell whether an individual is infectious or not, but can definitely detect the presence of a virus if done correctly, of course
PCR is intended to identify substances qualitatively, but by its very nature is unsuited for estimating numbers.
A distinction you and you retarded friend above https://poal.co/s/TellPoal/430363/258979df-8d88-4054-989a-7bf659195c06#cmnts fail to grasp
And you know what, when the virus is detected in samples coming from you... Chances are you're carrying the virus...
Now what is it you STILL don't understand you low IQ buffoon?
(post is archived)