WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

282

[FOR CLARIFICATION] If you are religious or part of a religious organization, you would continue to be part of that organization. Think of the following as a personal addendum to your faith. In the same way two individuals at the same church may disagree in the interpretation of a passage in the bible and how they choose to follow that passage, a person can still be part of a religion and have other deep founded faith/beliefs that may or may not necessarily align completely with their current faith. I am not talking about changing your current faith or religion, simply adding a personal faith/belief to your current faith and beliefs. For example, there are at least 20 different denominations of Baptists in the United States. Some religions might include the word "reformed" before they list their particular sect. If you are religious, I would suggest adding a new word, "informed". For example, "I am part of the Informed Seventh Day Baptists".

This new faith/belief is simple, you are not allowed to wear a face mask or take any vaccines that you don't want to and you don't have to give a reason.

Federal Law: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2017/10/26/2017-23269/federal-law-protections-for-religious-liberty

>Minersville School District v. Gobitis (1940) - If there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein.

>Importantly, the protection of the Free Exercise Clause also extends to acts undertaken in accordance with such sincerely-held beliefs. That conclusion flows from the plain text of the First Amendment, which guarantees the freedom to “exercise” religion, not just the freedom to “believe” in religion. See Smith, 494 U.S. at 877; see also Thomas, 450 U.S. at 716; Paty, 435 U.S. at 627; Sherbert, 374 U.S. at 403-04; Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205, 219-20 (1972). Moreover, no other interpretation would actually guarantee the freedom of belief that Americans have so long regarded as central to individual liberty. Many, if not most, religious beliefs require external observance and practice through physical acts or abstention from acts.

>The Free Exercise Clause protects beliefs rooted in religion, even if such beliefs are not mandated by a particular religious organization or shared among adherents of a particular religious tradition. Frazee v. Illinois Dept. of Emp't Sec., 489 U.S. 829, 833-34 (1989). As the Supreme Court has repeatedly counseled, “religious beliefs need not be acceptable, logical, consistent, or comprehensible to others in order to merit First Amendment protection.” Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye v. Hialeah, 508 U.S. 520, 531 (1993) (internal quotation marks omitted). They must merely be “sincerely held.” Frazee, 489 U.S. at 834.

>“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” U.S. Const. amend. I, cl. 1. Those protections have been incorporated against the States. Everson v. Bd. of Educ. of Ewing, 330 U.S. 1, 15 (1947) (Establishment Clause); Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 U.S. 296, 303 (1940) (Free Exercise Clause).

I understand that our current government has been attacking religion mercilessly under their medical tyranny hoax, but it's time to start filling up the courts with lawsuits. I want to sue every local business that tells me I have to wear a face mask. I want to sue my employer. I want to sue everyone. Let them publicly attack the freedom to practice religion in the courts daily. Shine a light on their attack on religion. Unite every religious person in the country together. Unite atheists with the religious. You don't have to believe in a deity in order to have faith. What we need more than ever is a united front against this tyranny on every level. Every courtroom every day should be filled with people fighting for their religious freedom not to wear a mask and their religious freedom to not to be forced to take injections.

“religious beliefs need not be acceptable, logical, consistent, or comprehensible to others in order to merit First Amendment protection.”

**[FOR CLARIFICATION]** If you are religious or part of a religious organization, you would continue to be part of that organization. Think of the following as a personal addendum to your faith. In the same way two individuals at the same church may disagree in the interpretation of a passage in the bible and how they choose to follow that passage, a person can still be part of a religion and have other deep founded faith/beliefs that may or may not necessarily align completely with their current faith. I am not talking about changing your current faith or religion, simply adding a personal faith/belief to your current faith and beliefs. For example, there are at least 20 different denominations of Baptists in the United States. Some religions might include the word "reformed" before they list their particular sect. If you are religious, I would suggest adding a new word, "informed". For example, "I am part of the Informed Seventh Day Baptists". This new faith/belief is simple, you are not allowed to wear a face mask or take any vaccines that you don't want to and you don't have to give a reason. Federal Law: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2017/10/26/2017-23269/federal-law-protections-for-religious-liberty >>Minersville School District v. Gobitis (1940) - If there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein. >>Importantly, the protection of the Free Exercise Clause also extends to acts undertaken in accordance with such sincerely-held beliefs. That conclusion flows from the plain text of the First Amendment, which guarantees the **freedom to “exercise” religion, not just the freedom to “believe” in religion**. See Smith, 494 U.S. at 877; see also Thomas, 450 U.S. at 716; Paty, 435 U.S. at 627; Sherbert, 374 U.S. at 403-04; Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205, 219-20 (1972). Moreover, no other interpretation would actually guarantee the freedom of belief that Americans have so long regarded as central to individual liberty. Many, if not most, religious beliefs require external observance and practice through physical acts or **abstention from acts**. >>The Free Exercise Clause protects beliefs rooted in religion, **even if such beliefs are not mandated by a particular religious organization or shared among adherents of a particular religious tradition**. Frazee v. Illinois Dept. of Emp't Sec., 489 U.S. 829, 833-34 (1989). As the Supreme Court has repeatedly counseled, **“religious beliefs need not be acceptable, logical, consistent, or comprehensible to others in order to merit First Amendment protection.”** Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye v. Hialeah, 508 U.S. 520, 531 (1993) (internal quotation marks omitted). They must merely be “sincerely held.” Frazee, 489 U.S. at 834. >>“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, **or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.**” U.S. Const. amend. I, cl. 1. Those protections have been incorporated against the States. Everson v. Bd. of Educ. of Ewing, 330 U.S. 1, 15 (1947) (Establishment Clause); Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 U.S. 296, 303 (1940) (Free Exercise Clause). I understand that our current government has been attacking religion mercilessly under their medical tyranny hoax, but it's time to start filling up the courts with lawsuits. I want to sue every local business that tells me I have to wear a face mask. I want to sue my employer. I want to sue everyone. Let them publicly attack the freedom to practice religion in the courts daily. Shine a light on their attack on religion. Unite every religious person in the country together. Unite atheists with the religious. You don't have to believe in a deity in order to have faith. What we need more than ever is a united front against this tyranny on every level. Every courtroom every day should be filled with people fighting for their religious freedom not to wear a mask and their religious freedom to not to be forced to take injections. **“religious beliefs need not be acceptable, logical, consistent, or comprehensible to others in order to merit First Amendment protection.”**

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

Just identify as Christian Scientist. If they push the fact that the official stance of the church allows vax simply respond with "Unfortunately many in the church are not as strong in their faith as they should be." You don't need to invent a new religion.

[–] 0 pt

Thought that was tge Jehovas witnesses

[–] 1 pt

Might be both. Christian Scientists believe faith will heal all wounds and if you die it's God's will. I wouldn't be surprised if there are other groups that believe the same.

Just to add: Jehovah's Witnesses don't believe those two things. I've never heard them referred to as "Christian Scientists" either, they do stem from a group that was just called the "Bible Students" though.

Maybe it's because a lot of these sects appeared on the scene in a similar time frame.

[–] 0 pt

I think you need to re-read what I wrote, there is no state mandated religion that you must use. Religion is faith/belief and nothing more. You don't have to justify your faith. If you believe that 32 virgins await you in death, you have that right to believe that. If you believe you shouldn't get a concoction injected into you, then you have that right under the constitution and nobody can take that away from you because it's not an "official" belief as part of an "official" organized religion.

Also, in the medical industry you are required to get certain vaccines to work there, thus, they say why did your religion allow those but not this one. If you read what I put in the post, you will see that you don't have to justify ANYTHING about your beliefs, even if they are contradictory or make no sense.

[–] 0 pt

Are you a jew lawyer? If not, stfu. Judges throw out cases citing "insincere beliefs" all the time.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Except being a Christian Scientist will work for "friends" and family. You do have to justify your beliefs to them. It's a fairly large church that's got a long history and is well respected and you can get professionally made literature from them. Telling your brainwashed cousin that you believe in the flying spaghetti monster isn't going to work, but giving her CS literature and asking her to come to Jesus will get her to fuck right off.

You can get a copy of Science and Health from amazon for $5 and being able to pull it out of your car on a moment's notice will silence anyone who tries to say you're faking it.

As far as the church accepting some vax, as I mentioned you just say their official stance allows you to make exceptions, but you're a hardcore believer.