WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.2K

[FOR CLARIFICATION] If you are religious or part of a religious organization, you would continue to be part of that organization. Think of the following as a personal addendum to your faith. In the same way two individuals at the same church may disagree in the interpretation of a passage in the bible and how they choose to follow that passage, a person can still be part of a religion and have other deep founded faith/beliefs that may or may not necessarily align completely with their current faith. I am not talking about changing your current faith or religion, simply adding a personal faith/belief to your current faith and beliefs. For example, there are at least 20 different denominations of Baptists in the United States. Some religions might include the word "reformed" before they list their particular sect. If you are religious, I would suggest adding a new word, "informed". For example, "I am part of the Informed Seventh Day Baptists".

This new faith/belief is simple, you are not allowed to wear a face mask or take any vaccines that you don't want to and you don't have to give a reason.

Federal Law: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2017/10/26/2017-23269/federal-law-protections-for-religious-liberty

>Minersville School District v. Gobitis (1940) - If there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein.

>Importantly, the protection of the Free Exercise Clause also extends to acts undertaken in accordance with such sincerely-held beliefs. That conclusion flows from the plain text of the First Amendment, which guarantees the freedom to “exercise” religion, not just the freedom to “believe” in religion. See Smith, 494 U.S. at 877; see also Thomas, 450 U.S. at 716; Paty, 435 U.S. at 627; Sherbert, 374 U.S. at 403-04; Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205, 219-20 (1972). Moreover, no other interpretation would actually guarantee the freedom of belief that Americans have so long regarded as central to individual liberty. Many, if not most, religious beliefs require external observance and practice through physical acts or abstention from acts.

>The Free Exercise Clause protects beliefs rooted in religion, even if such beliefs are not mandated by a particular religious organization or shared among adherents of a particular religious tradition. Frazee v. Illinois Dept. of Emp't Sec., 489 U.S. 829, 833-34 (1989). As the Supreme Court has repeatedly counseled, “religious beliefs need not be acceptable, logical, consistent, or comprehensible to others in order to merit First Amendment protection.” Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye v. Hialeah, 508 U.S. 520, 531 (1993) (internal quotation marks omitted). They must merely be “sincerely held.” Frazee, 489 U.S. at 834.

>“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” U.S. Const. amend. I, cl. 1. Those protections have been incorporated against the States. Everson v. Bd. of Educ. of Ewing, 330 U.S. 1, 15 (1947) (Establishment Clause); Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 U.S. 296, 303 (1940) (Free Exercise Clause).

I understand that our current government has been attacking religion mercilessly under their medical tyranny hoax, but it's time to start filling up the courts with lawsuits. I want to sue every local business that tells me I have to wear a face mask. I want to sue my employer. I want to sue everyone. Let them publicly attack the freedom to practice religion in the courts daily. Shine a light on their attack on religion. Unite every religious person in the country together. Unite atheists with the religious. You don't have to believe in a deity in order to have faith. What we need more than ever is a united front against this tyranny on every level. Every courtroom every day should be filled with people fighting for their religious freedom not to wear a mask and their religious freedom to not to be forced to take injections.

“religious beliefs need not be acceptable, logical, consistent, or comprehensible to others in order to merit First Amendment protection.”

**[FOR CLARIFICATION]** If you are religious or part of a religious organization, you would continue to be part of that organization. Think of the following as a personal addendum to your faith. In the same way two individuals at the same church may disagree in the interpretation of a passage in the bible and how they choose to follow that passage, a person can still be part of a religion and have other deep founded faith/beliefs that may or may not necessarily align completely with their current faith. I am not talking about changing your current faith or religion, simply adding a personal faith/belief to your current faith and beliefs. For example, there are at least 20 different denominations of Baptists in the United States. Some religions might include the word "reformed" before they list their particular sect. If you are religious, I would suggest adding a new word, "informed". For example, "I am part of the Informed Seventh Day Baptists". This new faith/belief is simple, you are not allowed to wear a face mask or take any vaccines that you don't want to and you don't have to give a reason. Federal Law: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2017/10/26/2017-23269/federal-law-protections-for-religious-liberty >>Minersville School District v. Gobitis (1940) - If there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein. >>Importantly, the protection of the Free Exercise Clause also extends to acts undertaken in accordance with such sincerely-held beliefs. That conclusion flows from the plain text of the First Amendment, which guarantees the **freedom to “exercise” religion, not just the freedom to “believe” in religion**. See Smith, 494 U.S. at 877; see also Thomas, 450 U.S. at 716; Paty, 435 U.S. at 627; Sherbert, 374 U.S. at 403-04; Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205, 219-20 (1972). Moreover, no other interpretation would actually guarantee the freedom of belief that Americans have so long regarded as central to individual liberty. Many, if not most, religious beliefs require external observance and practice through physical acts or **abstention from acts**. >>The Free Exercise Clause protects beliefs rooted in religion, **even if such beliefs are not mandated by a particular religious organization or shared among adherents of a particular religious tradition**. Frazee v. Illinois Dept. of Emp't Sec., 489 U.S. 829, 833-34 (1989). As the Supreme Court has repeatedly counseled, **“religious beliefs need not be acceptable, logical, consistent, or comprehensible to others in order to merit First Amendment protection.”** Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye v. Hialeah, 508 U.S. 520, 531 (1993) (internal quotation marks omitted). They must merely be “sincerely held.” Frazee, 489 U.S. at 834. >>“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, **or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.**” U.S. Const. amend. I, cl. 1. Those protections have been incorporated against the States. Everson v. Bd. of Educ. of Ewing, 330 U.S. 1, 15 (1947) (Establishment Clause); Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 U.S. 296, 303 (1940) (Free Exercise Clause). I understand that our current government has been attacking religion mercilessly under their medical tyranny hoax, but it's time to start filling up the courts with lawsuits. I want to sue every local business that tells me I have to wear a face mask. I want to sue my employer. I want to sue everyone. Let them publicly attack the freedom to practice religion in the courts daily. Shine a light on their attack on religion. Unite every religious person in the country together. Unite atheists with the religious. You don't have to believe in a deity in order to have faith. What we need more than ever is a united front against this tyranny on every level. Every courtroom every day should be filled with people fighting for their religious freedom not to wear a mask and their religious freedom to not to be forced to take injections. **“religious beliefs need not be acceptable, logical, consistent, or comprehensible to others in order to merit First Amendment protection.”**

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 11 pts

This country was founded on religious freedom. Vaccines were created to kill, and have aborted baby cells and animal DNA in them. If people would research they would find that muh polio is a lie, as is every single other vaccine. All created to control and kill. We've been lab rats for decades. My body is the Temple of Christ and I won't dishonor God.

[–] 1 pt

Don't make your argument depend on something they can rugpull.

[–] 4 pts

It doesn't even require a "new faith", nor even a new christian denomination, your own personal spin/interpretation of the christian narrative/scriptures is enough to support your position

[–] 0 pt

I mean if you say it's due to aborted babies and win your employer can come at you with a different requirement. You don't want to win an irrelevant case.

[–] 0 pt

Religious belief is anything you believe in so much you are willing to go above everything to defend it. You dont have to explain it to anyone else.

[–] 8 pts

You're overcomplicating this. The Church of Covid is a religious cult, complete with rituals, high priests, dogma, heretics, prescribed garments, etc.

You cant be compelled to join a church.

[–] 0 pt

That just means your employer has the right to require you to be vaccinated. Organizations have religious freedom too. Only the 1964 civil rights act stands in their way.

[–] 0 pt

We should legit start a religion called "the church of covid" and lampshade them.

[–] 3 pts

You got all this from studying boys?

FBI has been noticed by the way...

[–] 3 pts

The Hitlerites, est. 2021

[–] 0 pt

I. On it captain I'll assemble the army for marching sir

[–] 3 pts

Christian Scientists reject all medical treatment, so you could probably play that card.

[–] 2 pts

So they just choke you off from everything, short of forcing it on you. No job, no money, no food, no housing, no driving...

[–] 0 pt

They can attempt to do so - you just continue on as per normal, and say "Fuck your rules."

[–] 0 pt

I was assuming they threaten businesses if they won't be mini bullies for the government.

[–] 0 pt

They are going to do that anyway - whenever you resist any new decree, mandate or order. Taking the jab simply quickens the process for them. Your choice ...

[–] 0 pt

If someone feels strongly enough to bring guns to get me to take the vaxx, I feel the same way ensuring that I don't.

[–] 0 pt

Exactly. Ultimately It seems fairly simple, either one does or one doesn't. I do not need stacks of proof or lots of scientific study to back my position etc (it may help to clarify for others but this is not for them, lol) . End of the day - my choice.

[–] 2 pts (edited )

I objected to covering my face because it’s part of my head…

1 Corinthians 11:7-12 NIV [7] A man ought not to cover his head, since he is the image and glory of God; but woman is the glory of man. [8] For man did not come from woman, but woman from man; [9] neither was man created for woman, but woman for man. [10] It is for this reason that a woman ought to have authority over her own head, because of the angels. [11] Nevertheless, in the Lord woman is not independent of man, nor is man independent of woman. [12] For as woman came from man, so also man is born of woman. But everything comes from God.

And medical reason for not wanting an injection is I have a human body and I don’t want to inject man made lab goo into it. If men fall short of the glory of God and have been known to be evil I think it’s a fair option to be able to choose to not trust them at your discretion. It’s only through faith in Christ can they be redeemed, not faith in science.

[–] 0 pt

Please re-read what I posted, you don't have to quote bible verses because THERE IS NO OFFICIAL STATE RELIGION. Your belief system is your own and doesn't have to make sense, can be contradictory and is whatever you want it to be. The nation was founded by people who decided they wanted to worship in their own way without being told who they were allowed to worship. That is why it's in the constitution, that is why you don't need any person's interpretation or their concept of faith/beliefs/religion, it is what you want it to be, THERE ARE NO LIMITS OR BOUNDARIES.

[–] 1 pt

Just identify as Christian Scientist. If they push the fact that the official stance of the church allows vax simply respond with "Unfortunately many in the church are not as strong in their faith as they should be." You don't need to invent a new religion.

[–] 0 pt

Thought that was tge Jehovas witnesses

[–] 1 pt

Might be both. Christian Scientists believe faith will heal all wounds and if you die it's God's will. I wouldn't be surprised if there are other groups that believe the same.

Just to add: Jehovah's Witnesses don't believe those two things. I've never heard them referred to as "Christian Scientists" either, they do stem from a group that was just called the "Bible Students" though.

Maybe it's because a lot of these sects appeared on the scene in a similar time frame.

[–] 0 pt

I think you need to re-read what I wrote, there is no state mandated religion that you must use. Religion is faith/belief and nothing more. You don't have to justify your faith. If you believe that 32 virgins await you in death, you have that right to believe that. If you believe you shouldn't get a concoction injected into you, then you have that right under the constitution and nobody can take that away from you because it's not an "official" belief as part of an "official" organized religion.

Also, in the medical industry you are required to get certain vaccines to work there, thus, they say why did your religion allow those but not this one. If you read what I put in the post, you will see that you don't have to justify ANYTHING about your beliefs, even if they are contradictory or make no sense.

[–] 0 pt

Are you a jew lawyer? If not, stfu. Judges throw out cases citing "insincere beliefs" all the time.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Except being a Christian Scientist will work for "friends" and family. You do have to justify your beliefs to them. It's a fairly large church that's got a long history and is well respected and you can get professionally made literature from them. Telling your brainwashed cousin that you believe in the flying spaghetti monster isn't going to work, but giving her CS literature and asking her to come to Jesus will get her to fuck right off.

You can get a copy of Science and Health from amazon for $5 and being able to pull it out of your car on a moment's notice will silence anyone who tries to say you're faking it.

As far as the church accepting some vax, as I mentioned you just say their official stance allows you to make exceptions, but you're a hardcore believer.

[–] 0 pt

Do you have a fuckton of money? Because lawsuits, and many of them, require a fuckton of money.

[–] 0 pt

What you maybe meant to say is You need to have a judge that upholds the law.

(or doesnt punt it to another court to rule against you).

[–] 0 pt

There ya go. Pull the ol lawyer speak on em.

Load more (6 replies)