Agreeing to disagree is a Talmudic trick in itself. If you're right, be right. You don't need to end a debate giving even the semblance of compromise or common ground if there was none to be had.
Fucking sucks to lose friends to the insanity.
Agreeing to disagree is a Talmudic trick in itself. If you're right, be right. You don't need to end a debate giving even the semblance of compromise or common ground if there was none to be had.
Fucking sucks to lose friends to the insanity.
We all have our opinions, none of us are likely to agree all the time. In an educated conversation I see nothing bad about agreeing to disagree.
We all have our opinions, none of us are likely to agree all the time. In an educated conversation I see nothing bad about agreeing to disagree.
If you're working with opinions then sure. If you're working with objective facts the language of compromise just weakens you.
If you're working with opinions then sure. If you're working with objective facts the language of compromise just weakens you.
(post is archived)