Changing the rules to further the agenda
They haven't changed the rules, the FDA's role isn't to tell whether a drug qualifies as a vaccine or not. Its role is to approve (or disapprove) it for medical prescription, that's all. You can have a european vaccine or drug for instance, that works, but which hasn't yet received the FDA's approval. As a result US medics can't prescribe it.
https://www.usa.gov/federal-agencies/food-and-drug-administration
Broadly speaking, the FDA "is responsible for protecting the public health by assuring the safety, efficacy, and security of human and veterinary drugs, biological products, medical devices, our nation's food supply, cosmetics, and products that emit radiation. The FDA also provides accurate, science-based health information to the public."
That's all, nothing more, nothing less
But from what I've read after the approval they are subject to litigation if that now vaccine causes potential health or side effects.
Correct me if I'm wrong.
I don't know know
I believe there can always be exceptions granted by law makers, but that's what I believe, it's not something I know for sure
(post is archived)