Mostly because you don't know how to use it, not so much because it's rigged against you. It's rigged against the criminal defendant. Civil suits are an entirely different story.
So throughout our US history, the goy just don't know how to use it? That's why they've been consistently fucked over when trying?
Give me some examples where this has ever worked for a right wing dissident in the last 100 years.
Joe Arpaio, Vox Day, Owen Benjamin, Mike Enoch.
Plenty of people know how to use the system, not all of them kikes. The issue is that "right wing dissidents" are almost always poor and working class. Executive class people, like Trump, have experience using the courts and largely do not fear them.
A big part of the problem is that you don't see it as a tool that you can use to gain advantage. You see it as an enemy to be feared and avoided. In the 50s cops would run niggers out of town. Operation Wetback was only 60 years ago.
You also aren't as willing as the kikes to lie and cheat. Nothing is stopping you from dropping anonymous tips about the fags in your area trading cp. Or about the kikes doing fraud, or about all the heroin at the Antifa flop house. Nothing is stopping you from suing twitter for banning you. You just don't think that way.
POTUS and states were denied standing by SCOTUS, in a civil suit.
A big part of the problem is that you don't see it as a tool that you can use to gain advantage.
Not true at all. I agree. We should be waging 4th gen war on multiple fronts. Using the system to your advantage. Finding exploits. Peak damage is done from inside.
Nothing is stopping you from suing twitter for banning you.
Give me a guide, oh great enlightened one, that doesn't end up costing me a half million dollars I don't have.
And you are right about our veneration of honor, loyalty, empathy, patience being a weakness. In war, the enemy gets a vote. Perceived nobility or a highroad is fastpath suicide.
(post is archived)