Thank you.
Upon reading the original tweet and the included excerpt from the material in question I have to say you may be over reacting. While the text is written in the racist tone of CRT there is nothing in there that is overtly racist. If you are going to fight CRT in your school you can't do it by pointing at a portion of CRT that isn't racist.
I don't see why the teacher should not be talking to her students about this issue. I agree that it should not be taught from the racist perspective of CRT, but that is a very nuanced argument to make. Unless you are prepared to show up with a dissertation on how and why CRT is racist and how using this paper to talk about a legitimate issue will unnecessarily introduce harmful and inappropriate propaganda then I don't think you should be fighting on this hill.
At best this is an opportunity to get the administration to affirm that they are against CRT and do not allow it in their school. And the teacher should not be punished so long as she agrees not to use materials written with the assumptions, insinuations, and racist claims of CRT.
Pointing it out in all forms is still worthwhile imo
(post is archived)