We can stop the Big Jews in their tracks if we can build enough awareness among the general population. If we wait two years, things will be much worse and it will be more difficult to restore our economy and our justice system. Too many non-white fuckups will be in positions of power. Too many insane lesbians will be running our lives.
It's up to all of us to do what we can to turn things around. We may be a small segment of the population, but we are the segment that actually knows what is going on, at least on the lower levels (I doubt that anyone knows what is going on at the highest level). We need to force the majority to face some hard truths about sex and race and religion.
As we say here, "Once you see it, it can't be unseen." Once you know, for example, that American niggers have an average 85 IQ and are simply incapable, on a genetic level, of running cities because they lack the intelligence, you know it for life. The average person does not know these things yet. They need to be educated -- not brainwashed, which is what the liberal fascists are doing, but educated in the reality of things.
Reality has no political bias, it is just reality. It is the way things are. People need to face reality. They have been fed a diet of fantasy by the left for far too long.
If we wait two years, things will be much worse
That's what wakes up the general population. Most don't care until it's at their front door. That's how democracy works unfortunately. It's always reactive. Otherwise people would be watching the stock market and rioting in the streets because the Democrats own stated goal is to plunge us into debt and then print our way back out.
Once you know, for example, that American niggers have an average 85 IQ and are simply incapable, on a genetic level, of running cities
This is white-nigger tier logic. You're referencing IQ, and then contradicting the implications of said IQ. The Flynn Effect means that IQ steadily increases over time. So when half the country was illiterate, and the average was 100, that's very different from today where almost everyone is literate and the average IQ is 100. For example,
Ulric Neisser estimated that using the IQ values of 1997, the average IQ of the United States in 1932, according to the first Stanford–Binet Intelligence Scales standardization sample, was 80.
That means someone who scores 100 today, would've scored much higher in the 1930s, 40s, 50s, etc. They measure IQ every year with a new sample of the population, and the new sample almost always scores higher.
So when you say
incapable, on a genetic level, of running cities because they lack the intelligence, you know it for life
If you're using IQ as your basis for argument then you're contradicting yourself, because the average black IQ today is higher than the entire average IQ in the 1930s, when the US was overwhelmingly white.
I'm just letting you know it's a very stupid argument.
Genetic IQs have been dropping for more than two centuries. If you look at genetic tests that do not rely on schooling (reaction time, color recognition, etc.). What has increase is education and test taking abilities.
Even with a better education, look at popular books back then compared to now. Dickens wrote for the paupers and the masses, nowadays the equivalent would be Grisham, King, or Brown. That's a substantial drop in vocabulary, complexity, and structure.
As they say, the proof is in the pudding.
I like that. I agree. This past week or so I've been running into lots of people on here who are quite insightful and pleasant to talk to. I have no idea why there's this sudden shift but I'm loving it.
that's not how IQ works an you cite 1 line from 1 study proving your point? lol
my eyes and common sense trump your "iq studies"
not 1 2 story building in africa that wasn't build by the white man
"they measure a new sample"
what are the demographics of said samples? I noticed you left that out lmfao
could very well be whitepeople are getting smarter and non whites are stagnating, we really don't know because of the laughable amount of "supporting" evidence you gave while simultaneously lecturing others about the "stupidity" of their argument
look in a mirror son
Anything else I should type into the search bar for you just let me know.
my eyes and common sense trump your "iq studies"
It's stupid to reference IQ, as you're acknowledging that form of measurement as valid, and then turning around and calling it fallacious. At that point you're just arbitrarily going through and tossing out information you don't like while picking out the stuff you do from the same source. It's really fucking stupid. It's like saying "here's my source, but also, ignore these specific sections of my source that contradict my point. I decided that's wrong because I don't agree with it"
(post is archived)