Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.2K

e: "incorrectly" I ONLY use that word because NONE of the other options that could work are known, so "incorrectly" is the only one that fits perfectly.

First: I am not saying this for any reason other than to let those of you who weren't aware understand this. The US constitution has a process for voting for, inaugurating and seating a president. The US constitution has NO places in it ANYWHERE for handling an incorrectly (fraudulently, illegally, treasonously (?), whatever) inaugurated POTUS. NONE.

And this is a giant linchpin in the happenings of the situation. The true, legal, and actual ONLY way to resolve this would be for a constitutional congress to successfully modify the constitution and apply it in an ex-post-facto manner. The law and all things legal doesn't usually like ex-post-facto as it strips many basic tenants of legal versus illegal out of the equation. It does happen, but it's rare and generally things which would be ex-post-facto are grandfathered in. Like the drinking age. (Just an example, not a comparison, the two situations are in no way equivalent)

Second: I think everyone can agree with me on this one; There is a lesser chance of a constitutional congress doing the above than there is for (((Q))) to be anything other than a jew-controlled, civ-nat, cuckoldry fetish based piece of propaganda.

e: "incorrectly" I **ONLY** use that word because **NONE** of the other options that could work are known, so "incorrectly" is the only one that fits perfectly. First: I am not saying this for any reason other than to let those of you who weren't aware understand this. The US constitution has a process for voting for, inaugurating and seating a president. The US constitution has NO places in it ANYWHERE for handling an incorrectly (fraudulently, illegally, treasonously (?), whatever) inaugurated POTUS. NONE. And this is a giant linchpin in the happenings of the situation. The true, legal, and actual ONLY way to resolve this would be for a constitutional congress to successfully modify the constitution and apply it in an ex-post-facto manner. The law and all things legal doesn't usually like ex-post-facto as it strips many basic tenants of legal versus illegal out of the equation. It does happen, but it's rare and generally things which would be ex-post-facto are grandfathered in. Like the drinking age. (Just an example, not a comparison, the two situations are in no way equivalent) Second: I think everyone can agree with me on this one; There is a lesser chance of a constitutional congress doing the above than there is for (((Q))) to be anything other than a jew-controlled, civ-nat, cuckoldry fetish based piece of propaganda.

(post is archived)

[–] • 2 pts

Biden is on video bragging about being aware of the voting fraud.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=BRZEs9BRGK4

  1. Simply prove that voting fraud occurred.

  2. utilize the provisions of the Constitution to impeach piss-pants for high crimes. We have the video of his confession already. we don't require additional evidence beyond the fact that it simply occurred.

that said, elected Republicans are weak pussies. they won't do shit.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

People need to wake the hell up. There is no separate political party of the Rs. They are corrupt and weak. They swing with the wind, lie and blame others for their losses. Then do absolutely nothing to stop the niggers. Nothing. They never had our backs and that includes Trump. See how they all ran for cover during the voting fraud.

[–] • 2 pts (edited )

The expectation that the audits will remove Biden are ill-founded. What will likely happen is that the audits and potential re-run elections will cause the democrats to be ejected at the state level. It means that the country will have to weather the Biden administration till the 2022 elections when new house and senate seats get filled, tipping the balance to thwart most of the damage Biden can do to America from that point on.

EDIT: It also means that all the Biden stuff will look less and less legitimate and the Biden administration will have two options: 1. To ignore public opinion and do whatever the fuck they want (pushing the public even further to the right in reaction). or 2. Back off and appear to be more legitimate in action to prevent further damage to the Democratic party (but at the expense of the party's objectives).

[–] • 1 pt

Self-reply because it's a meaningful separation; IF Biden is to be found as having broken the law himself AND in the unlikely scenario he is impeached we would then need to expect his own party (one party system hurrr durr) to find him guilty and unseat him. IN WHICH CASE we would be graced with dick-sucker in chief. And further down the line if she were also to be found guilty and unseated. etc. etc. etc.

[–] • 2 pts (edited )

The federal government and governments in general will become impotent, it's not a question of if but when

Just like in the USSR

Look at south africa, the police had to rely on the citizenry to provide for ammunition, and we haven't even reached bottom when it comes to .gov impotence.

Firearm ownership is paramount, not to fire at .gov, but to confront reality when .gov ends up turning into a big nothing, a myth for all practical purposes, and the hordes of retarded murderers start roaming the streets, burning, looting, murdering and raping, all over the place. That's what's in store, that's why they relentlessly push for gun confiscation. They want to render people, and whites more specifically, defenseless against those hordes which will actually carry the physical removal/genocide, on behalf of those ochestarting this disaster behind scene. Because the US is scheduled for termination. We can all see the writing on the wall flickering like a christmas tree; everything under the sun is done to sabotage the nation at pretty much every level. It's not just a series of mere coincidences and accidents, "missmagement", that's called sabotage, there's a concerted effort at work here. And it's no coincidence if the sovereignty of the individual and the collective is relentlessly under attack since decades.

If the tide can be turned, then it's all good. If .gov nuisance can be reduced to the minimum until the inevitable collapse happens, then all the better. In the meantime, prepare accordingly, and don't count on .gov to rescue itself or anybody else.

[–] • 1 pt

When Trump and the GOP failed to defend the election, they ceded the nation to the deep state.

[–] • 0 pt

muh deep state

Go back to cuckchan.

[–] • 0 pt

imagine thinking our elected actors and actresses are smart enough and there's no hidden mechanisms behind the facade of public government

I guess all those smart presidents warning us about a hidden hand and unaccountable monied groups behind the scenes were the early Q-tards.

[–] • 1 pt

It's not in the Constitution because the only vote for President of the United States that matters in the Constitution is the Electoral College. The states are free to choose how they select their electors. Nothing in the Constitution says it has to be by popular vote, or by any vote at all. The Electoral College voted for Biden. There's nothing to be done, Constitutionally speaking.

[–] • 0 pt

There is - it is known as the 2A.