What we say isn't to rescue people that agree with us. Your aim is to build consensus, it appears. Mine is to trigger people in to arriving at the truth. I'm not arguing about how what you're saying is wrong. My suggestion is to keep in mind that you can affect them if you desire it and that there are better ways to accomplish that if you actually try.
What we say isn't to rescue people that agree with us. Your aim is to build consensus, it appears. Mine is to trigger people in to arriving at the truth.
I'm not arguing about how what you're saying is wrong. My suggestion is to keep in mind that you can affect them if you desire it and that there are better ways to accomplish that if you actually try.
>Mine is to trigger people in to arriving at the truth.
Then why do you refuse to call a spade a spade? These people are communists, that is the truth.
>>Mine is to trigger people in to arriving at the truth.
Then why do you refuse to call a spade a spade? These people are communists, that is the truth.
What's the minimum amount I need to repeat myself with you? Am I close yet?
What's the minimum amount I need to repeat myself with you? Am I close yet?
You can bullshit to your hearts content, you're still wrong.
You can bullshit to your hearts content, you're still wrong.
(post is archived)