WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

307

That qtard congresswoman is in the news again comparing the door-to-door vaxx brigade to the nazis. Of course now the news is full of muh hall-of-cost articles. Calling people nazis is using the language of the left, we should call people bolshies, commies, maoists, etc...

That qtard congresswoman is in the news again comparing the door-to-door vaxx brigade to the nazis. Of course now the news is full of muh hall-of-cost articles. Calling people nazis is using the language of the left, we should call people bolshies, commies, maoists, etc...

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

>I'm in favor of calling the consensus police nazis.

Which is a bad idea, as MTG demonstrates. Calling people nazis is a tactic of the left, which is why it doesn't work when people on the right do it. So instead we should call them communists.

[–] 0 pt

The idea isn't for it to "work", it's to get the retards to think a little harder. Nothing has to "work", man. You just keep trying shit until you get through to people. Of course if you want to go curl up in to a ball and cry yourself to sleep, you can also try that. Until then, let people that aren't whiny little brats handle the psych war. Thanks.

[–] 0 pt

>It's to get the retards to think a little harder

Which is why calling people nazis is a losing idea, it doesn't make the retards think, it just gives the left an excuse to ban people. Calling them commies on the other hand makes people think, it also puts the left in a position where they have to defend commies, which would cause people to think.

[–] 0 pt

What we say isn't to rescue people that agree with us. Your aim is to build consensus, it appears. Mine is to trigger people in to arriving at the truth. I'm not arguing about how what you're saying is wrong. My suggestion is to keep in mind that you can affect them if you desire it and that there are better ways to accomplish that if you actually try.