WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

1.2K

That qtard congresswoman is in the news again comparing the door-to-door vaxx brigade to the nazis. Of course now the news is full of muh hall-of-cost articles. Calling people nazis is using the language of the left, we should call people bolshies, commies, maoists, etc...

That qtard congresswoman is in the news again comparing the door-to-door vaxx brigade to the nazis. Of course now the news is full of muh hall-of-cost articles. Calling people nazis is using the language of the left, we should call people bolshies, commies, maoists, etc...

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

>It's to get the retards to think a little harder

Which is why calling people nazis is a losing idea, it doesn't make the retards think, it just gives the left an excuse to ban people. Calling them commies on the other hand makes people think, it also puts the left in a position where they have to defend commies, which would cause people to think.

[–] 0 pt

What we say isn't to rescue people that agree with us. Your aim is to build consensus, it appears. Mine is to trigger people in to arriving at the truth. I'm not arguing about how what you're saying is wrong. My suggestion is to keep in mind that you can affect them if you desire it and that there are better ways to accomplish that if you actually try.

[–] 0 pt

>Mine is to trigger people in to arriving at the truth.

Then why do you refuse to call a spade a spade? These people are communists, that is the truth.

[–] 0 pt

What's the minimum amount I need to repeat myself with you? Am I close yet?