WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

740

(post is archived)

[–] 6 pts

satanic globalists

[–] 2 pts

It's ok, you're on poal. You can call a spade a spade.

[–] 0 pt

Why would I want to call a spade?

[–] 1 pt

Because you can!

[–] 0 pt

spade epithet for nigger

I mean... I get what you're saying, I hope. But jews aren't spades so if that was a play on words it doesn't work.

[–] 1 pt

Communists and radical jihadists are pretty fucking bad. Those woke antifa freaks? BLM terrorists? They are bad.

[–] 1 pt

Succinct.

[–] 0 pt

succinct

How is;

The most dangerous extremists of our age are not radical jihadists, nor fundamentalist Christians, nor white supremacists, nor communists, nor anarchists, but mainstream adherents to the status quo politics that are murdering people around the world and driving us to armageddon.

Succinct? Could have, should have been;

The most dangerous extremists of our age are next door jews

[–] 1 pt

but mainstream adherents to the status quo politics that are murdering people around the world and driving us to armageddon.

mainstream adherents

Good order followers, aka 90% of people.

Work on your reading comprehension. Niggerfaggot

[–] -1 pt

None of;

but mainstream adherents to the status quo politics that are murdering people around the world and driving us to armageddon.

Is true though. Not even remotely. It's relying on the jewish lie of voting results and polling results. We all know those are completely fabricated.

Niggerfaggot

Go to voat.

[–] 1 pt

... No? Emphatically no. Fuck you, this is jewish as fuck: no.

The most dangerous extremists are your next door jews.

[–] 1 pt

This is true, if you consider the status quo to be liberal fascism. It is certainly in control, thanks to its control over the media, but I wouldn't say it was the majority, or even dominant in our culture.

[–] 1 pt

Does Armageddon really sound that bad though? Why does it have to involve destruction of "positive" things? Why can't it just be an erosion of bad things, presuming "positive" forces preside over "negative" ones by the end?

[–] 0 pt

It is always better to have gradual change instead of apocalyptic change. However, it is very frustrating for those who have to endure it. If you look back in history at the French Revolution, the English revolt under Cromwell, even the American Revolution, those were not pleasant times for the average person. If such horrors can be averted, that is good, even if individuals must postpone instant gratification.

[–] 0 pt

I think we'll find beauty, inspiration, even reverence in the pending upheaval.