If you are 16+ years old, you let someone pull a surgical knife on your penis, and you realize that this made your sex life worse, you deserve it.
Even if you were factually correct, there is no point in arguing this case if you are genuinely against circumcision and not trying to be subversive. Because some parents will use that as an excuse to mutilate their child.
Well think that if you like. Im not subversive but im sure i wont be able to convince you of that. Just wanted to point out that among the 3 options late stage circumcision is definitely the worst. And if hearing that makes you circumsize you kid then you never actually wanted to give them a choice. You wanted to pressure them into it and convince yourself you gave them a choice and so chose not to give them a choice when you realized they would choose contrary to your wishes.
I don't understand why you think this is helpful to point out.
In africa they have
Does it matter if it's actually easier to stretch a childs lips without consent then if they were to voluntarily mutilate their mouth in adulthood? Is that something you feel the need to point out?
Can you see my point of view? That there is nothing to gain by pointing out a child can better deal with cosmetical mutilation?
If parents can be convinced to postpone their decision in mutilating their child, why would you give them any reason not to?
This isnt exactly the platform where you need to sell your ideas. We all largely agree around here on most things. I was more just discussing. I like to fully discuss and explore concepts. Most things i say on this platform are because i wanted to say them not because someone needed to hear them. I go to places where normies are when trying to actually wake up normies.
(post is archived)