Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

553

Covid: There's only a small chance of death, but we're going to lockdown, socially distance, and mask up everyone so that we can save even one more person.

Vaccine: There's only a small chance of death, so we're going to give you free donuts, free beer, and even a chance to win millions of dollars so that you'll take it.

Hypocrisy at its finest.

Covid: There's only a small chance of death, but we're going to lockdown, socially distance, and mask up everyone so that we can save even one more person. Vaccine: There's only a small chance of death, so we're going to give you free donuts, free beer, and even a chance to win millions of dollars so that you'll take it. Hypocrisy at its finest.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (94).
[–] • 0 pt

Here’s how deaths attributed to covid are calculated.

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/excess_deaths.htm

Your specific needs as to the how the deaths are attributed can be ignored because the answer can be calculated using other methods.

[–] • 0 pt

Prove to me those were COVID. Prove to me COVID exists.

[–] • 0 pt
[–] • 0 pt

Yes, I've seen that article. It's interesting in it's use of stock coronavirus images.

Now, prove to me that those excess deaths were 100% from COVID. Prove to me that the deaths reported to VAERS had absolutely nothing to do with the recent injections. Prove to me that those excess deaths were, in fact, excess - even your link bandies the word "estimated" around a lot, and every other study I can find varies so widely from others that they're useless.

And finally, post your sources for those two numbers you started with, 1 in 100 and 1 in 10,000,000.