Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

520

Covid: There's only a small chance of death, but we're going to lockdown, socially distance, and mask up everyone so that we can save even one more person.

Vaccine: There's only a small chance of death, so we're going to give you free donuts, free beer, and even a chance to win millions of dollars so that you'll take it.

Hypocrisy at its finest.

Covid: There's only a small chance of death, but we're going to lockdown, socially distance, and mask up everyone so that we can save even one more person. Vaccine: There's only a small chance of death, so we're going to give you free donuts, free beer, and even a chance to win millions of dollars so that you'll take it. Hypocrisy at its finest.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (94).
[–] • 0 pt
[–] • 0 pt

Yes, I've seen that article. It's interesting in it's use of stock coronavirus images.

Now, prove to me that those excess deaths were 100% from COVID. Prove to me that the deaths reported to VAERS had absolutely nothing to do with the recent injections. Prove to me that those excess deaths were, in fact, excess - even your link bandies the word "estimated" around a lot, and every other study I can find varies so widely from others that they're useless.

And finally, post your sources for those two numbers you started with, 1 in 100 and 1 in 10,000,000.

[–] • 0 pt

They were by definition caused by covid.

The VAERS data needs to prove that the vaccines caused the deaths, not me to prove it didn’t.

The excess deaths pattern has been observed worldwide. That’s sound enough for me to believe the disease is real.

And finally, there are plenty of sources to attribute the 1% figure, go and research it.

As for the 1 in 10,000,000 figure, there hasn’t been a single death attributed to the vaccines so I used a figure close to zero.

[–] • 0 pt

They were by definition caused by covid.

That's not very useful. Definitions can be changed depending on how the story is written.

I did research the 1% figure, it's incorrect for the USA. As I stated, it's 1 in 56 if you believe the CDCs numbers. If you believe their report that less than 10% died from as opposed to "with," then the number is closer to 1 in 560 or higher. If you believe the "You can have it without symptoms," then the number is probably even higher than the 1 in 560 - who is going to get tested when you don't have symptoms? Again. POST YOUR SOURCE, without it, it's just a number.

so I used a figure close to zero.

And that's what it boils down to. Number pulled from the air. The only numbers we'll ever have on deaths from injections are the ones you disclaim, and that's because no one is ever going to research it because *you must take this vaccine because we said so."