Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K

I could be married to a useless girl who doesn't know how to make food, doesn't know how to cook.

A woman like her who doesn't know how to cook, it's garbage that only makes you spend even more money, so don't marry or have anything with a useless being of this type, or sooner or later she'll make you regret being born.

Woman who is too lazy or useless and don't know or don't want to learn how to cook, should die.

I could be married to a useless girl who doesn't know how to make food, doesn't know how to cook. A woman like her who doesn't know how to cook, it's garbage that only makes you spend even more money, so don't marry or have anything with a useless being of this type, or sooner or later she'll make you regret being born. Woman who is too lazy or useless and don't know or don't want to learn how to cook, should die.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (21).
[–] • 1 pt

A uterus with good genes.

[–] • 0 pt

A part of having good genes is being willing to learn new things and not act like a lazy nigger.

[–] • 0 pt

A very small part. I think environment and upbringing have a much more deterministic role in those traits. A woman's role is not to fix things, learn skills, plan ahead. Women will often not express those traits even if they carry the genes for them because they understand their role and responsibilities. They focus on what will maximize their value. However, they still carry those genes and pass them on to their sons, who do need them and use them. I have seen this in practice with "house wives" who have industrious, cleaver sons. Their fathers and brothers have those same traits even if they do not.