Why would you mix crazy theories without any evidence with hard proof of fraud and potential mass genocide when the parties committing the crimes are in the middle of the act?
Why would you mix crazy theories without any evidence with hard proof of fraud and potential mass genocide when the parties committing the crimes are in the middle of the act?
Because I have the mind of an investigator, always trying to understand the motive of the criminal. I don't have the luxury of access to the evidence, but I still investigate nevertheless.
Because I have the mind of an investigator, always trying to understand the motive of the criminal. I don't have the luxury of access to the evidence, but I still investigate nevertheless.
(post is archived)