WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

837

Just like the bank can shut off your account, they want to be able to shut you off from downloading electricity to your vehicle if you aren't in line. Your vehicle will have a unique identifier, and they will be able to see (with AI and blockchain) every last bit of electricity distributed to every uniquely-identifiable vehicle.

The e-fuel station won't even dispense energy to your car unless it identifies your vehicle, which will be tied to your digital ID, and verifies you are a good citizen. All cars will ping the antennas along the roadways, and your travel history will be recorded in a blockchain ledger.

Imagine the level of control they will have being able to track all of this. Are you waking up? The "green" movement is just a fucking distraction.

Just like the bank can shut off your account, they want to be able to shut you off from downloading electricity to your vehicle if you aren't in line. Your vehicle will have a unique identifier, and they will be able to see (with AI and blockchain) every last bit of electricity distributed to every uniquely-identifiable vehicle. The e-fuel station won't even dispense energy to your car unless it identifies your vehicle, which will be tied to your digital ID, and verifies you are a good citizen. All cars will ping the antennas along the roadways, and your travel history will be recorded in a blockchain ledger. Imagine the level of control they will have being able to track all of this. Are you waking up? The "green" movement is just a fucking distraction.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

You know you can charge your car with those generators, right? And with solar panels. There's no way to sell gas as being more resistant to attack because to use gas you have to have electricity plus gas plus transport for the gas plus a refinery for the gas plus oil for the refinery. With electric you just have to have the electricity.

[–] 0 pt

Dude, do you really think they are shoving us into EVs for our own good? Or for their advantage?

[–] 0 pt (edited )

I don't know why they are. I can tell you that it's not to gain more control because they literally have less control over electricity than gasoline. Maybe their political donors have power plants and their enemy's donors own oil stocks. Who knows?

[–] 0 pt

It's for more control.

You have to understand how much energy daily petroleum is, it's a lot. 390m gallons used every day, and each gallon is 120m Joules. This doesn't include diesel. To substitute that with electricity, would mean huge amounts of electricity being made and also transported. I doubt there will be any upgrade to the grid, until it's too late.

Most people will not be able to afford solar, it's expensive now, and it will get more expensive when the demand skyrockets. Leaving most people to charge their cars quickly at stations, requiring large amounts of current quickly, putting stress on the grid. Yes there will likely be chargers everywhere, but the impact to the grid would be massive. We will likely see brownouts and blackouts occur more often.

Chargers will eventually have a QoS style of delivery, giving energy to government vehicles first, then the most dead batteries, then everyone else. You would need this to prevent everyone from taking maximum charge as the electrical infrastructure in each area cannot handle a dump of charge for everyone at once.

Now with everyone using electricity, if they decide to shut the grid down, literally everything shuts down. There is no movement, most people will rely on the grid to charge the fleet semis to transport goods and their cars.

You think ok well, I have solar and many others. But where are you going to go? If a warehouse has solar on its roof, it will be able to charge one or two semis assuming there is sun. You won't be going to any store or venue as no deliveries will be made.

At least with gas, diesel, EV you have a backup system in case one goes down.