You're not wrong, but I think it's the wrong perspective.
People fund scientists who agree with them.
It's a minor change in words, but a clearer picture of reality, imo.
You're not wrong, but I think it's the wrong perspective.
People fund scientists who agree with them.
It's a minor change in words, but a clearer picture of reality, imo.
yeh, tobacco companies funding 'research' back in the 50's
most research is legit though, otherwise your career is over, it's the people that tend to cherry pick the results they like and ignore the research that contradicts it
yeh, tobacco companies funding 'research' back in the 50's
most research is legit though, otherwise your career is over,
it's the people that tend to cherry pick the results they like and ignore the research that contradicts it
no, science is so corrupt and fraudulent. Not, merely people with similar ideas. You got it way wrong. 100%
no, science is so corrupt and fraudulent. Not, merely people with similar ideas. You got it way wrong. 100%
But if they get their money from the government they are representing the people though!
But if they get their money from the government they are representing the people though!
(post is archived)