WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

1.1K

Hesitancy implies that the individual will carry through with the action after given some encouragement. No. Most who have not taken the gene therapy injections are not hesitating, they are refusing. But when the (((powers that be))) mandate these “vaccines” or evoke rights for those that refuse, it will all fall under the guise that we were just hesitant. This buzzword was carefully crafted. Evil stuff.

Hesitancy implies that the individual will carry through with the action after given some encouragement. No. Most who have not taken the gene therapy injections are not hesitating, they are *refusing*. But when the (((powers that be))) mandate these “vaccines” or evoke rights for those that refuse, it will all fall under the guise that we were just hesitant. This buzzword was carefully crafted. Evil stuff.

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 4 pts

I hate the word safe as well. All this stuff is being done to keep us "safe." We're all in this together.

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

"We're all in this together" = "You're on your own" "Social distancing" = "Keep living in your bubble" "Vaccine hesitant" = "Non-compliance to experimentation" "Wear a mask" = "Dehumanize yourselves" "Keeping you safe" = "We'll shame you into submission"

[–] 2 pts

Just remind those who use this term that the government, pharmaceutical companies and NGOs pushing for everyone to take the experimental mRNA gene therapy are "liability hesitant". They don't want to be financially, legally or criminally liable for the effects that these so called "vaccines" have attached to them. Make sure they know that if they took the shots with the experimental gene treatment that they have absolutely zero recourse if the jab causes them or their loved ones harm. Then ask them why these organizations pushing the vaccine are not wanting to take on the liability of their policies and products. You need to make them see the problem for what it really is.

[–] 1 pt

Yep. They are assuming the sale. They are not asking whether or not we are going to get jabbed. They are asking what jab would we like.

[–] 1 pt

ask a liberal if women have a duty to the government and society to give up access to their bodies to have at least 2 children. They will say no. But, if women don't do this, society and humanity WILL end. Population will decline until 0 and both will cease to be. Now how come I have to give up access to my body to the government and society to save maybe 1% of the population from dying of covid? F U liberal, It's not about it being a good idea or a bad idea, its about me saying no and you respecting that.