WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.5K

I've been closely watching all of the "vaccine" aftereffects, and was a little suspicious about the whole 'herpes' thing. And here it is. He JUST told us this in a Zoom meeting.

Another co-worker also admitted to getting the Moderna, but stated he had very little aftereffects.

This shit is evil.

I've been closely watching all of the "vaccine" aftereffects, and was a little suspicious about the whole 'herpes' thing. And here it is. He JUST told us this in a Zoom meeting. Another co-worker also admitted to getting the Moderna, but stated he had very little aftereffects. This shit is evil.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt (edited )

The long term side effects are not known

Is that going to be your criteria for future pandemics too? Say something with a slightly higher death rate comes along, or a slightly faster rate of infection.

Societies standard response to infections hasn't changed for centuries. Isolate. Clean. Use whatever medical technology is available. Now look at the American Right wing behaviour during this event. No Isolation, minimal cleaning. Zero uptake of medical technology. If this was more serious and was allowed to spread faster, we could all be dead right now. And for what? Owning the Libs?

If there is a standard way of dealing with outbreaks, it makes more sense just to get on with it, rather than run round in circles and blame whatever.

Right now people on this forum are losing their shit over one word of mouth report of someone linking shingles to a vaccine, or the assertion that just being around vaccinated people initiates a miscarriage. This forum way is more full of shit than any CDC person could be.

the PCR test is giving false positives

so what? so does Tinder, so do antivirus apps, so do barking dogs...

Why would you get vaccinated on the premise of a shit test?

because that's the standard way of dealing with outbreaks. Virus exists. Virus spreads. People die. Vaccinate population. Repeat in 10 years. I really don't care if the implementation of a global effort to fight this is slightly flawed, what level of competence did you expect from Governments elected entirely on the basis of personalty?

Herd immunity

That's nice, but to get there old or fat people will possibly have to die in the process, some people object to their parents being dead.

[–] 0 pt

I need not reply to someone who knows nothing about medicine. I gave you an answer, but you are like a child you tell not to do something. You will go and do whatever you were told not to do cause you are too stubborn to listen.

It is still about risk assessment.

And the flu pandemic of 1968 counters your narrative trying to lay blame on conservatives. You are full of shit and also lack knowledge of history.

The dumbasses trying to use this narrative about blaming a case of Shingles is wrong. The Varicella virus can lay dormant in people who have not been vaccinated for chicken pox. I agree with you there. That is about the only thing I agree with.

All institutions have been infiltrated by libtards. They all have liberal agendas. That includes the WHO, CDC, etc. I don't feel like giving sources cause I tried earlier and the fucking page refreshed cause I wrote so much.

One more thing, just so I can call you out on your hypocrisy. The inconsistencies in every one of the latter institutions have been consistently flawed, but you still believe in them. So then you go ahead and try to validate your defense of a test that the creator says should not be used to test for Corona virus. You are very dense.

[–] 0 pt

I gave you an answer

and I decided it was dubious

flu pandemic of 1968

I didn't see you make a case there?

They all have liberal agendas. That includes the WHO, CDC

would agree, I've see WHO and a couple of supposedly research groups openly enable mass migration. But then WHO depends on being funded by other nations, so if they are a bit crap then it's mostly down to lack of money and incompetence

creator says should not be used to test for Corona virus

the implication there is that his is a "lone voice being suppressed", when really it's a well known issue: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanres/article/PIIS2213-2600(20)30453-7/fulltext

but that doesn't discount that people are being admitted with recognisable symptoms, and then dying. Do you expect them to ignore a viable test just because it's a bit crap? they are making do with what they have available, as you would expect. You are just choosing to interpret that as some highly organised global conspiracy.

besides, they are also doing the lateral flow test which is vastly more reliable