WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

I've been closely watching all of the "vaccine" aftereffects, and was a little suspicious about the whole 'herpes' thing. And here it is. He JUST told us this in a Zoom meeting.

Another co-worker also admitted to getting the Moderna, but stated he had very little aftereffects.

This shit is evil.

I've been closely watching all of the "vaccine" aftereffects, and was a little suspicious about the whole 'herpes' thing. And here it is. He JUST told us this in a Zoom meeting. Another co-worker also admitted to getting the Moderna, but stated he had very little aftereffects. This shit is evil.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

I gave you an answer

and I decided it was dubious

flu pandemic of 1968

I didn't see you make a case there?

They all have liberal agendas. That includes the WHO, CDC

would agree, I've see WHO and a couple of supposedly research groups openly enable mass migration. But then WHO depends on being funded by other nations, so if they are a bit crap then it's mostly down to lack of money and incompetence

creator says should not be used to test for Corona virus

the implication there is that his is a "lone voice being suppressed", when really it's a well known issue: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanres/article/PIIS2213-2600(20)30453-7/fulltext

but that doesn't discount that people are being admitted with recognisable symptoms, and then dying. Do you expect them to ignore a viable test just because it's a bit crap? they are making do with what they have available, as you would expect. You are just choosing to interpret that as some highly organised global conspiracy.

besides, they are also doing the lateral flow test which is vastly more reliable