WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

415

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Elaborate.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

In no way the nick randomizer prevents you from replying to comment replies, so from there you can have a prolonged exchange, and you don't need to see your own nick or the nick attached to the message you're replying to

But I get that some people like to contemplate their own shit with their name on it

[–] 1 pt

I literally contemplate my own shit. I also want, when I'm responding to someone, for them to be able to identify that they're reading a response from and potentially responding to the same person.

[–] 0 pt

>I also want, when I'm responding to someone, for them to be able to identify that...

What makes you think I give two shits about who you are

[–] 1 pt

In no way the nick randomizer prevents you from replying to comment replies

I never said it prevented replies. It prevents you from knowing who exactly you are replying to/is replying to you.

Even this chain of comments is confusing as fuck to someone who just stumbles in. It looks like there are 10 individuals commenting, when it's probably actually only 3 of us?

And I can show you a fucking example of it being hard to keep track of who is who in a prolonged argument or debate or w/e you want to call it: https://poal.co/s/Videos/337670/4a26e6f2-0753-4905-bffb-f7791392a8ab#cmnts

I made a comment. A bunch of people replied. Look for the one talking about fetishes. Then try to make sense of what the fuck is happening there, as it looks like there are 15+ users involved. This is fucking retarded.

April fool's day was 3 days ago. This garbage needs to be unfucked.

[–] 0 pt

>It prevents you from knowing who exactly you are replying to/is replying to you.

Why does it even matter "who" said it?

>Even this chain of comments is confusing as fuck to someone who just stumbles in. It looks like there are 10 individuals commenting, when it's probably actually only 3 of us?

No, the graphical representation of comments make it clear enough. You can tell which message is an answer to another

And again, it's what is said that matters, not who said it

The point, is what matters, not who made it

>And I can show you a fucking example of it being hard to keep track of who is who

This isn't a beauty contest

[–] 0 pt

I replied to whomever replied to you. It doesn't bother me like it does you, but your concerns are legitimate and him dismissing them in that way was petty.

This is LurkedForever.

[–] 0 pt

You cant tell who anybody is in the conversation. I mean you cant even tell if the person you are responding to has just responded to you or if its someone else. Its annoying. Jesus. Just end it.

[–] 0 pt

>You cant tell who anybody is in the conversation.

So what? Is this preventing me from replying to you? No.

>I mean you cant even tell if the person you are responding to has just responded to you or if its someone else. Its annoying. Jesus. Just end it.

Why do you care about "who" you're talking to?

You're looking to make some friends?