WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

695

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts

a few

Attempted a few months ago by an actual militia that got glowniggrered the fuck out.

Then a few years ago with Bundy, and many years ago with Ruby Ridge etc.

Porn is unconstitutional, but the ZOGSA allows it.

ALL WEAPONS are FULLY protected by the constitution. But the ZOGSA unconstitutionally disallows them.

[–] 1 pt

Porn is unconstitutional...

I'm good with that but how is it unconstitutional?

[–] 2 pts

It's obscene. Obscene language is not protected by the first.

The SCOTUS case that "decided" this is hilariously kikey. I wish I could remember the name.

Something to do with Prurient.

[–] 2 pts

That sounds super jewey. I'm not for porn or "obscenity" but I'm not okay with censorship. I'd like to see the case.

[–] -1 pt

The Constitution doesn't say anything about obscenity. That was invented out of thin air by activist judges.