WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

Porn is unconstitutional...

I'm good with that but how is it unconstitutional?

[–] 2 pts

It's obscene. Obscene language is not protected by the first.

The SCOTUS case that "decided" this is hilariously kikey. I wish I could remember the name.

Something to do with Prurient.

[–] 2 pts

That sounds super jewey. I'm not for porn or "obscenity" but I'm not okay with censorship. I'd like to see the case.

[–] 0 pt

following the constitution's moral compass sounds jewy

Fuck off.

[–] -1 pt

The Constitution doesn't say anything about obscenity. That was invented out of thin air by activist judges.