It's obscene. Obscene language is not protected by the first.
The SCOTUS case that "decided" this is hilariously kikey. I wish I could remember the name.
Something to do with Prurient.
It's obscene. Obscene language is not protected by the first.
The SCOTUS case that "decided" this is hilariously kikey. I wish I could remember the name.
Something to do with Prurient.
That sounds super jewey. I'm not for porn or "obscenity" but I'm not okay with censorship. I'd like to see the case.
That sounds super jewey. I'm not for porn or "obscenity" but I'm not okay with censorship. I'd like to see the case.
following the constitution's moral compass sounds jewy
Fuck off.
>following the constitution's moral compass sounds jewy
Fuck off.
Where the fuck does the constitution touch on obscenity?? Or are you trusting some kiked judge to interpret it for you?
Where the fuck does the constitution touch on obscenity?? Or are you trusting some kiked judge to interpret it for you?
The Constitution doesn't say anything about obscenity. That was invented out of thin air by activist judges.
The Constitution doesn't say anything about obscenity. That was invented out of thin air by activist judges.
(post is archived)