The distinction is whether you're sitting in prison or not. Your choices are to sit in prison knowing the Constitution is on your side, or not to go to prison.
Correct.
Absolutely. The distinction isn't made in some magical attempt to guarantee the Second Amendment remains uninfringed. The distinction is part of the logical argument surrounding the morality of our obligation to abide by law/legal code and when that moral obligation is null.
My point is that life isn't so simple. Sure, there may be some moral obligation to refuse to adhere to illegal laws, but there is also a moral obligation to provide for one's family. If I go to jail the wife and kids lose the house, they lose cars, they have no way to feed themselves, or anything else. In other words, I'm not a nigger. I have to support my family.
I know, man. It's the fucked up catch 22 ZOG has us in. You maintain moral consistency in one arena and another suffers. We're always compromising so we can feed our kids and I fucking hate it.
(post is archived)