The basis of your argument is also incredibly wrong.
Except it's not. The argument that had been presented was that asymptomatic spread of a virus doesn't happen.
Asymptomatic spread is a hoax.
context: virus
Well. There you go. I presented two.
Had he been specific it would be proved wrong by the original though of my prior post;
You can't spread a virus that doesn't exist.
So try harder I guess. You're bad at this.
OP is referring to the asymptomatic spread of the flu, it's even stated in his heading. He's right, many virologists, epidemiologists, doctors, etc. have stated asymptomatic spread of flu type viruses are rare. You used a completely different type of virus that requires direct contact in an attempt to debunk his statement and said the entire basis of his claim is wrong.
You're the one that needs to try harder, you failed miserably.
jewflu doesn't exist. It's irrelevant to reality, which is why I led there and now here you are pilpuling away.
LOL. ok, I won't waste any more of my time on you, you're obviously not worth it.
(post is archived)