"Virus doesn't exist" is an irrelevant distraction narrative, because it gets into the weeds and leaves one half open to saying "but-but-half a million deaths! six million deaths!"
It's always the details that destroy a narrative, not the big barbed wire issues. The barbed wire is what they use to get us arguing, divided, and destroy any attempts to undermine the narrative.
"Virus doesn't exist" is an irrelevant distraction narrative,
rofl rofl rofl rofl rofl rofl
because it ... leads to ... "but-but-half a million deaths!" - nice appeal to emotion by forcing the jew.lie of the holocaust in there.
Except the opposite happens. What happens is people take in more facts backed by evidence and realize "it's" literally just the cold.
How the fuck did you get there? That is pure nigger-logic.
details destroy a narrative
Yes. Like the only one that matters;
jewflu doesn't exist. There is no virus.
None of this irrelevant garbage about asymptomatic spread. That's 100% retarded. People can be asymptomatic of herpes and they can infact spread it. So the entire basis of your post is so incredibly wrong.
ee: there's also faggot.kike parties to spread GRIDS by individuals who are asymptomatic.
So you want to know what's irrelevant? This asymptomatic falsehood.
People can be asymptomatic of herpes and they can infact spread it. So the entire basis of your post is so incredibly wrong.
The basis of your argument is also incredibly wrong. You're comparing a virus that requires direct skin to skin contact where as a flu virus can be transmitted through the air.
Unlike a flu virus that you can get through the air, herpes spreads by direct contact, that is, directly from the site of infection to the site of contact. For example, if you have a cold sore and kiss someone, you can transfer the virus to their mouth. Similarly, if you have active genital herpes and have vaginal or anal intercourse, you can give your partner genital herpes. Finally, if you have a cold sore and put your mouth on your partners genitals (oral sex), you can give your partner genital herpes.
Herpes transmits through open sores. It's cyclical, not all the time.
The basis of your argument is also incredibly wrong.
Except it's not. The argument that had been presented was that asymptomatic spread of a virus doesn't happen.
Asymptomatic spread is a hoax.
context: virus
Well. There you go. I presented two.
Had he been specific it would be proved wrong by the original though of my prior post;
You can't spread a virus that doesn't exist.
So try harder I guess. You're bad at this.
People can be asymptomatic of herpes and they can infact spread it. So the entire basis of your post is so incredibly wrong.
Thanks, this is actually useful. I hope they do go with the herpes angle. It's actually the best response we could hope for from them. Wouldn't have seen it unless you'd commented. Seriously thanks.
Think about it: How much ridicule is gonna come out against the left when they compare it to herpes? Everyones gonna be memeing "oh no the left thinks we all have herpes!" and laughing their asses off. It sounds like panicporn, and it's gonna be mocked as that. And as we know mockery causes the left to shrivel or overreact.
Also the AIDS/GRIDS comparison immediately splinters the left and its fag allies, and reinforces the stereotype of "regressive left."
The faggot blocked me. Lol.
Nice garbage nonreply.
(post is archived)