People can be asymptomatic of herpes and they can infact spread it. So the entire basis of your post is so incredibly wrong.
The basis of your argument is also incredibly wrong. You're comparing a virus that requires direct skin to skin contact where as a flu virus can be transmitted through the air.
Unlike a flu virus that you can get through the air, herpes spreads by direct contact, that is, directly from the site of infection to the site of contact. For example, if you have a cold sore and kiss someone, you can transfer the virus to their mouth. Similarly, if you have active genital herpes and have vaginal or anal intercourse, you can give your partner genital herpes. Finally, if you have a cold sore and put your mouth on your partners genitals (oral sex), you can give your partner genital herpes.
Herpes transmits through open sores. It's cyclical, not all the time.
The basis of your argument is also incredibly wrong.
Except it's not. The argument that had been presented was that asymptomatic spread of a virus doesn't happen.
Asymptomatic spread is a hoax.
context: virus
Well. There you go. I presented two.
Had he been specific it would be proved wrong by the original though of my prior post;
You can't spread a virus that doesn't exist.
So try harder I guess. You're bad at this.
OP is referring to the asymptomatic spread of the flu, it's even stated in his heading. He's right, many virologists, epidemiologists, doctors, etc. have stated asymptomatic spread of flu type viruses are rare. You used a completely different type of virus that requires direct contact in an attempt to debunk his statement and said the entire basis of his claim is wrong.
You're the one that needs to try harder, you failed miserably.
jewflu doesn't exist. It's irrelevant to reality, which is why I led there and now here you are pilpuling away.
(post is archived)