WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

602

Just sell domestic production as being "green".

"Container ships and overseas shipping use MASSIVE amounts of coal and oil. It's destroying the environment! Thats why we need to bring manufacturing back to the west. Also think of the homeless and homeless veterans. Don't we want to give them opportunities unlike corporate america that just wants cheap slave labor that promotes INEQUALITY?"

Also, when selling this, always use "carbon emissions AND pollution." rather than simply "carbon emissions."

For the people that already believe carbon emissions ARE pollution, it probably won't do anything. But by changing an OR to an AND, people who are skeptical get to claim they are being

  1. fair and balanced

  2. while simultaneously supporting bringing manufacturing back to america

  3. the 'and' splits the idea of carbon emissions FROM the idea of pollution, drawing a subtle line between the two. The implication being that carbon emissions are something OTHER than pollution, which is a message worth spreading.

Just sell domestic production as being "green". "Container ships and overseas shipping use MASSIVE amounts of coal and oil. It's destroying the environment! Thats why we need to bring manufacturing back to the west. Also think of the homeless and homeless veterans. Don't we want to give them opportunities unlike corporate america that just wants cheap slave labor that promotes INEQUALITY?" Also, when selling this, always use "carbon emissions AND pollution." rather than simply "carbon emissions." For the people that already believe carbon emissions ARE pollution, it probably won't do anything. But by changing an OR to an AND, people who are skeptical get to claim they are being 1. fair and balanced 2. while simultaneously supporting bringing manufacturing back to america 3. the 'and' splits the idea of carbon emissions FROM the idea of pollution, drawing a subtle line between the two. The implication being that carbon emissions are something OTHER than pollution, which is a message worth spreading.

(post is archived)

Hahaha... it was never about green. It is about being dependent on either China or Israel.

[–] 1 pt

Use their narratives against them.

This might work on low level normals but the counter argument would be your racist against asians.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

but the counter argument would be your racist against asians.

Fair point.

My response will be "us nazis LOVE azns. Just look at all the weebs lusting after slant eyed poon."

To the moderates this reads as sarcasm and makes the left look hysterical which is only to our benefit on the right.

The race card is pretty worn out at this point anyway.