Well not really, it’s a linguistic term that was co-opted and misused a jew paedo fag. It’s how you differentiate masculine and feminine nouns in gendered languages. The fact nouns are defined as “masculine” and “feminine” when any sort of differentiation could be used is a bit odd, and is why the term could be co-opted with relative ease.
Well not really, it’s a linguistic term that was co-opted and misused a jew paedo fag. It’s how you differentiate masculine and feminine nouns in gendered languages. The fact nouns are defined as “masculine” and “feminine” when any sort of differentiation could be used is a bit odd, and is why the term could be co-opted with relative ease.
How about this, it was a term used to describe language, not sex? John Money invented a modern “use” to create confusion and separation between it and biological sex, whereas previously, the term “sex” was sufficient, and remains so.
In short, stop being a fag and using the term “gender,” as it is a “social construct,” as is all language.
How about this, it was a term used to describe language, not sex? John Money invented a modern “use” to create confusion and separation between it and biological sex, whereas previously, the term “sex” was sufficient, and remains so.
In short, stop being a fag and using the term “gender,” as it is a “social construct,” as is all language.
This anon gets it.
This anon gets it.
(post is archived)