WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

926

What the fuck over all the site is pretty decent but God damn what kind of faggot blocks people for disagreeing on some website. How much of a gamma bitch can you be. Ohhh no I can't see the words from that guy he is mean.

I'm not shilling people or trolling or harassing these faggots just don't like my take or are trigger by something I don't understand.

It's fucking pathetic

What the fuck over all the site is pretty decent but God damn what kind of faggot blocks people for disagreeing on some website. How much of a gamma bitch can you be. Ohhh no I can't see the words from that guy he is mean. I'm not shilling people or trolling or harassing these faggots just don't like my take or are trigger by something I don't understand. It's fucking pathetic

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

dickhead A then "makes a post" boo hoo poor dickhead B cannot reply to dickhead B makes a post problem solved

No, it's not "solved". It won't appear in the proper place and won't receive the visibility it should. It defeats the whole point of threading. Why can't you just admit allowing users to block other users from replying is a terrible idea, especially for a supposed "free speech" site? Even AOU knows this, which is why he "fixed" it by not having it apply to users level 30 and above.