Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.4K

The owner has made a point to not let anyone know who they are. I find that interesting. Especially since they have no problem letting other posts borderline doxing information about me.

https://archive.md/CkRZN

Poal doesn't allow doxing. Agree with the policy or not at least we have some.

The owner has made a point to not let anyone know who they are. I find that interesting. Especially since they have no problem letting other posts borderline doxing information about me. https://archive.md/CkRZN Poal doesn't allow doxing. Agree with the policy or not at least we have some.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (281).
[–] • 1 pt

Yeah the amount of people bitching about Poal elsewhere is pretty silly, especially since they almost never have a cogent point.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

The commentary about Poal was in reaction to Poal maintainers posting and pinning a thread dishonestly accusing the voat.xyz maintainers of condoning doxing. The current voat.xyz rules include "No doxing members of the site" and "No posting of illegal content.". AOU and pmyb2 currently have account membership at voat.xyz. Under the rules of the site they are protected from doxing. (If it would be illegal to do so, it is also disallowed).

The question comes down to free speech. Is it acceptable to discuss doxing without actually doxing? If your answer is no, I suggest to look back at the poalcast where PMYB2 and others discuss: "We don't condone raping but if you were to hypothetically rape someone, who would it be."

Pick a lane.