The commentary about Poal was in reaction to Poal maintainers posting and pinning a thread dishonestly accusing the voat.xyz maintainers of condoning doxing. The current voat.xyz rules include "No doxing members of the site" and "No posting of illegal content.". AOU and pmyb2 currently have account membership at voat.xyz. Under the rules of the site they are protected from doxing. (If it would be illegal to do so, it is also disallowed).
The question comes down to free speech. Is it acceptable to discuss doxing without actually doxing? If your answer is no, I suggest to look back at the poalcast where PMYB2 and others discuss: "We don't condone raping but if you were to hypothetically rape someone, who would it be."
Pick a lane.
The commentary about Poal was in reaction to Poal maintainers posting and pinning a thread dishonestly accusing the voat.xyz maintainers of condoning doxing. The current voat.xyz rules include "No doxing members of the site" and "No posting of illegal content.". AOU and pmyb2 currently have account membership at voat.xyz. Under the rules of the site they are protected from doxing. (If it would be illegal to do so, it is also disallowed).
The question comes down to free speech. Is it acceptable to discuss doxing without actually doxing? If your answer is no, I suggest to look back at the poalcast where PMYB2 and others discuss: "We don't condone raping but if you were to hypothetically rape someone, who would it be."
Pick a lane.
(post is archived)