I never described it as a bulwark.
I never described it as a bulwark.
If you didn't think it was a defense against pedos, what were you framing your belief that most normies are against child abuse as this whole time?
If you didn't think it was a defense against pedos, what were you framing your belief that most normies are against child abuse as this whole time?
I'm saying that currently it is a step too far for most normies, and that it can be used to redpill them and make them question the value of the degeneracy movement. This is not a hard line in the sand, and if the position is not exploited it will be overrun. It is not a bulwark.
I'm saying that *currently* it is a step too far for most normies, and that it can be used to redpill them and make them question the value of the degeneracy movement. This is not a hard line in the sand, and if the position is not exploited it will be overrun. It is not a bulwark.
How will this line in the sand be exploited better than the interracial marriage and homosexual marriage lines in the sand, in your plan? Can it be exploited well enough to hold the line this time?
How will this line in the sand be exploited better than the interracial marriage and homosexual marriage lines in the sand, in your plan? Can it be exploited well enough to hold the line this time?
(post is archived)