I'm saying that currently it is a step too far for most normies, and that it can be used to redpill them and make them question the value of the degeneracy movement. This is not a hard line in the sand, and if the position is not exploited it will be overrun. It is not a bulwark.
I'm saying that *currently* it is a step too far for most normies, and that it can be used to redpill them and make them question the value of the degeneracy movement. This is not a hard line in the sand, and if the position is not exploited it will be overrun. It is not a bulwark.
How will this line in the sand be exploited better than the interracial marriage and homosexual marriage lines in the sand, in your plan? Can it be exploited well enough to hold the line this time?
How will this line in the sand be exploited better than the interracial marriage and homosexual marriage lines in the sand, in your plan? Can it be exploited well enough to hold the line this time?
You're attaching far more weight to this suggestion than I am. I never claimed that it would be a bulwark and I never said it would hold the line.
You're attaching far more weight to this suggestion than I am. I never claimed that it would be a bulwark and I never said it would hold the line.
(post is archived)