How about TQP? If anyone is paedophiles, it's the TQ+. Look at assigned male. He's the worst type of paedo. Poor baby too. The baby was probably only 0-1 year old too :(. All of the subtypes of paedophiles can be of any sexual orientation. You can be heterosexual, homosexual or bisexual and still like 0-19 year olds (FYI, the subtypes of paedophiles ages were created by someone using these ages, not me). I've heard some people on another platform saying on r/askgaybros that they lure in people either age of consent or age of majority teenagers to date or sleep with them (so basically 16-19 year olds), because they can take advantage of the adolescents easily, and go hurr durr it's legal all at the same time. There's even studies of age gap relationships where they studied 13-19 year old girls and how dangerous it is. Also, even though drinking age is 21 in the States, your liver and brain aren't fully developed. Teen pregnancies are also as risky as a middle aged women 40-59 giving birth. Obviously, pubescent adolescents will have as much of a risk as a 59 year old (assuming she still hasn't gone through menopause yet) giving birth, whilst post pubescent adolescents might have the same risk as women in their 40's. Also, the lesbians advocated against all the types of paedos because it's obvious paedos have no place in society, regardless of subtype. That's why there's "Get the L out" in the UK. TDLR: Any biological sex and sexuality can be paedos, TQ+ is more likely to be a subtype of paedo, some gay men take advantage of 16-19 year old boys because they're naive, age gap relationships between teen girls and grown ass adult men are risky, teen pregnancies are as risk as middle aged women pregnancies, adolescents organs aren't developed until your 20's lesbians advocated against paedo groups like that man boy love disgusting groups in the 70's, and there's a group called "Get the L out" in the UK.