Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.2K

If you are posting on a normie site, instead of LGBT write LGBTP. When asked what the P stands for, explain P stands for pedophiles / pederasts. This way normies will understand that LGBT is about dangerous degenerates, not so called minorities.

If you are posting on a normie site, instead of LGBT write LGBTP. When asked what the P stands for, explain P stands for pedophiles / pederasts. This way normies will understand that LGBT is about dangerous degenerates, not so called minorities.

(post is archived)

[–] • 10 pts (edited )

Won’t work.

They aren’t afraid to admit it anymore.

Look how they infiltrate schools and promote 10yo boys in gay club as brave.

[–] • 2 pts

But there's still enough of them horrified by child abuse to cause discord.

[–] [deleted] • 3 pts

They aren't actually horrified. Drag story time at libraries wouldn't exist if women didn't take their kids to them. Child abuse ends where virtue signaling begins.

[–] • 0 pt

I'll qualify: There's still enough of them horrified by child molestation and rape

[–] • 0 pt

child abuse ends when the abusing parents life ends

[–] • 2 pts

Correct, divide and conquer reversed.

[–] • 2 pts

Yet they say nothing for fear of being ostracized, harassed, doxxed, threatened.

[–] • 0 pt

From what I've seen, pro-pedo advocates still have to tread carefully.

Keep in mind that a lot of lesbians and trans-men ended up that way because of trauma related to sexual abuse. I also read that lesbians were instrumental in kicking pro pederast advocates out of early gay organisations like the Matachine society.

[–] • 0 pt

im with you. accelerate for them. hand out pamflets and hold fake events welcoming P's into the mix.

[–] • 1 pt

How about LGBTSS?

SS -Super Straight

Basically it's like responding to BLM with "all lives matter".

[–] • 3 pts

I don't engage them. Just ignore them. They're nothing but attention whores.

[–] • 1 pt

Tried that. They just say Pansexual, whatever that is...

[–] • 1 pt

It's just bisexual with extra steps

[–] • 0 pt

How about TQP? If anyone is paedophiles, it's the TQ+. Look at assigned male. He's the worst type of paedo. Poor baby too. The baby was probably only 0-1 year old too :(. All of the subtypes of paedophiles can be of any sexual orientation. You can be heterosexual, homosexual or bisexual and still like 0-19 year olds (FYI, the subtypes of paedophiles ages were created by someone using these ages, not me). I've heard some people on another platform saying on r/askgaybros that they lure in people either age of consent or age of majority teenagers to date or sleep with them (so basically 16-19 year olds), because they can take advantage of the adolescents easily, and go hurr durr it's legal all at the same time. There's even studies of age gap relationships where they studied 13-19 year old girls and how dangerous it is. Also, even though drinking age is 21 in the States, your liver and brain aren't fully developed. Teen pregnancies are also as risky as a middle aged women 40-59 giving birth. Obviously, pubescent adolescents will have as much of a risk as a 59 year old (assuming she still hasn't gone through menopause yet) giving birth, whilst post pubescent adolescents might have the same risk as women in their 40's. Also, the lesbians advocated against all the types of paedos because it's obvious paedos have no place in society, regardless of subtype. That's why there's "Get the L out" in the UK.

TDLR: Any biological sex and sexuality can be paedos, TQ+ is more likely to be a subtype of paedo, some gay men take advantage of 16-19 year old boys because they're naive, age gap relationships between teen girls and grown ass adult men are risky, teen pregnancies are as risk as middle aged women pregnancies, adolescents organs aren't developed until your 20's lesbians advocated against paedo groups like that man boy love disgusting groups in the 70's, and there's a group called "Get the L out" in the UK.

[–] • 0 pt

I've been doing it for some time already everywhere.

[–] • 0 pt

Or you could just kill them. Since, you know, that’s actually fighting them and not NORMALIZING THEIR DESIRES.

[–] • 0 pt

The bible makes it clear, these people deserve to die, and go to hell. See Sodom and Gommorah as a prime example of what god thinks about sin cities

[–] • 0 pt

I just call them faggots.

[–] • 0 pt

Jack Posobiek tried that nonsensical bullshit. It backfired.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

>Love is love!

It really does backfire.

Load more (7 replies)